Wednesday, July 08, 2009
Priorities
Yes the governor cut the physically and mentally handicapped but at least we still have the opera!
Voter fraud.....Guess where?
37 people were found to have been allowed to vote fraudulently in Memphis after a first cursory sweep of the 2008 election. About half were felons and the other half were not even registered to vote. I wish I could say I was surprised but it is Memphis we are talking about. With no real proof of identification required to vote in Tennessee I wonder how many voted fraudulently using someone else's name or identity.
Wall street Journal covers my guns on campus bill
Actually my bills were for current and former military and police to be able to carry on campus, but close enough. The issue continues to move forward in this Wall Street Journal article.
Monday, July 06, 2009
Unemployment tax hits
I just started getting calls from business owners about how their unemployment tax just took a huge jump. One said how even though he had never laid anyone off his tax went from $49.00 per person to over $100.00 per person. He had employed 11 people but now may have to cut back to 10. I am sure some legislators will think the one person should thank them now because they have a good unemployment plan instead of a job.
Travel time
With tough economic times travel on the states dime is limited for non legislators. It is another story for legislators. Why? I will let this WSMV quote of Rep. Joe Towns tell you all you need to know.
The biggest traveler in the state House is Rep. Joe Towns of Memphis. In one month alone, he traveled to Florida, Washington, D.C., and Santa Fe....
"I will travel more this year," said Towns. "You know why? Because the policy allows it to happen."
I had a bill this last year to limit the travel of legislators to one trip a year unless in the executive branch. It died in the split committee system.
The biggest traveler in the state House is Rep. Joe Towns of Memphis. In one month alone, he traveled to Florida, Washington, D.C., and Santa Fe....
"I will travel more this year," said Towns. "You know why? Because the policy allows it to happen."
I had a bill this last year to limit the travel of legislators to one trip a year unless in the executive branch. It died in the split committee system.
Working with both sides
Does anyone remember the old George Carlin comedy routine where he said anyone who drove faster then you was a "maniac" and anyone who drove slower then you was an "idiot"? When some people talk about "working together in a bipartisan way" I think back to that old routine.
Seems like if you don't agree with someone on an issue you are stubborn and unwilling to work with the other side. If you explain your point of view and say why you believe what you do then you are "Arrogant" and "Trying to push people around".
Of course if a person does not agree with your point of view on the budget, it is they who should be willing to move their point of view to yours, never the other way around. If they don't? Well then threatening a districts road projects is totally acceptable, no pushing around going on there. Matter of fact that doesn't even ever happen. Never did.
Seems like if you don't agree with someone on an issue you are stubborn and unwilling to work with the other side. If you explain your point of view and say why you believe what you do then you are "Arrogant" and "Trying to push people around".
Of course if a person does not agree with your point of view on the budget, it is they who should be willing to move their point of view to yours, never the other way around. If they don't? Well then threatening a districts road projects is totally acceptable, no pushing around going on there. Matter of fact that doesn't even ever happen. Never did.
Saturday, July 04, 2009
4TH OF JULY
Have you ever wondered what happened to the 56 men who signed the Declaration of Independence?
Five signers were captured by the British as traitors, and tortured before they died.
Twelve had their homes ransacked and burned. Two lost their sons serving in the Revolutionary Army;
another had two sons captured.
Nine of the 56 fought and died from wounds or hardships of the Revolutionary War.
They signed and they pledged their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor.
What kind of men were they?
Twenty-four were lawyers and jurists. Eleven were merchants, nine were farmers and large plantation owners;
men of means, well educated, but they signed the Declaration of Independence knowing full well that the penalty
would be death if they were captured.
Carter Braxton of Virginia, a wealthy planter and trader, saw his Ships swept from the seas by the British Navy.
He sold his home and properties to pay his debts, and died in rags.
Thomas McKeam was so hounded by the British that he was forced to move his family almost constantly.
He served in the Congress without pay, and his family was kept in hiding. His possessions were taken from him,
and poverty was his reward.
Vandals or soldiers looted the properties of Dillery, Hall, Clymer, Walton, Gwinnett, Heyward, Ruttledge, and
Middleton.
At the battle of Yorktown, Thomas Nelson, Jr., noted that the British General Cornwallis had taken over the
Nelson home for his headquarters. He quietly urged General George Washington to open fire. The home was destroyed,
and Nelson died bankrupt.
Francis Lewis had his home and properties destroyed. The enemy jailed his wife, and she died within a few months.
John Hart was driven from his wife's bedside as she was dying. Their 13 children fled for their lives. His fields and
his gristmill were laid to waste. For more than a year he lived in forests and caves, returning home to find his wife dead
and his children vanished. Some of us take these liberties so much for granted, but we shouldn't.
So, take a few minutes while enjoying your 4th of July holiday and give your thanks to these patriots.
It's not much to ask for the price they paid.
Five signers were captured by the British as traitors, and tortured before they died.
Twelve had their homes ransacked and burned. Two lost their sons serving in the Revolutionary Army;
another had two sons captured.
Nine of the 56 fought and died from wounds or hardships of the Revolutionary War.
They signed and they pledged their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor.
What kind of men were they?
Twenty-four were lawyers and jurists. Eleven were merchants, nine were farmers and large plantation owners;
men of means, well educated, but they signed the Declaration of Independence knowing full well that the penalty
would be death if they were captured.
Carter Braxton of Virginia, a wealthy planter and trader, saw his Ships swept from the seas by the British Navy.
He sold his home and properties to pay his debts, and died in rags.
Thomas McKeam was so hounded by the British that he was forced to move his family almost constantly.
He served in the Congress without pay, and his family was kept in hiding. His possessions were taken from him,
and poverty was his reward.
Vandals or soldiers looted the properties of Dillery, Hall, Clymer, Walton, Gwinnett, Heyward, Ruttledge, and
Middleton.
At the battle of Yorktown, Thomas Nelson, Jr., noted that the British General Cornwallis had taken over the
Nelson home for his headquarters. He quietly urged General George Washington to open fire. The home was destroyed,
and Nelson died bankrupt.
Francis Lewis had his home and properties destroyed. The enemy jailed his wife, and she died within a few months.
John Hart was driven from his wife's bedside as she was dying. Their 13 children fled for their lives. His fields and
his gristmill were laid to waste. For more than a year he lived in forests and caves, returning home to find his wife dead
and his children vanished. Some of us take these liberties so much for granted, but we shouldn't.
So, take a few minutes while enjoying your 4th of July holiday and give your thanks to these patriots.
It's not much to ask for the price they paid.
Friday, July 03, 2009
Thursday, July 02, 2009
Gov. still unwilling to help non profits become stable
The bill to help non profits be able to fund their own actions once again becomes law without the governors signature. The licence plate bill brings in money to non profits on a voluntary basis and costs the state nothing. How is anyone hurt unless they just want control over the group in question?
Cobb replacement?
Pat Marsh, a Bedford County small business owner of a trucking company, is considering entering the race for former state Representative Curt Cobb's seat. He may be the man to beat in the race as he has a great track record in creating jobs and growing a small business.
Why wait for the opposition to start
Barely out of the door and Robin Smith already has the liberal press screaming.
There was a time when a candidate would at least get to make an announcement that they were running for office. They might get a piece or two to highlight their achievements or why they were running for office. Then as the campaign wore on and the attacks got nastier the press would report what was said. Now they are cutting out the middle man (The opposition) and starting the hits off while at the campaign announcement.
Of course Robin is an energetic young Conservative female with a good family so the press will pull out all the stops to destroy her as soon as possible.
There was a time when a candidate would at least get to make an announcement that they were running for office. They might get a piece or two to highlight their achievements or why they were running for office. Then as the campaign wore on and the attacks got nastier the press would report what was said. Now they are cutting out the middle man (The opposition) and starting the hits off while at the campaign announcement.
Of course Robin is an energetic young Conservative female with a good family so the press will pull out all the stops to destroy her as soon as possible.
Enforce the laws and guess what?
People stop breaking them in your area. This Tennessean article points out what can happen when immigration laws are in place and acted upon.
Rep. Curt Cobb Quits.
The election to fill his seat could be huge in so many ways. I am pretty sure this is a Republican controlled county. Otherwise Cobb probably would have held out until the one year limit was past and it would have gone to an appointment of the county commission. I am sure he knows a Republican controlled county commission would probably have given Republicans control of the seat automatically.
In an off year odd election Democrats have a terrible history of not showing up at the polls on election day. Memories of the Ofelia Ford special election come to mind where Dems spent a ton of money and still almost lost to a Republican candidate with no money and little support in a heavily Democrat district.
In an off year odd election Democrats have a terrible history of not showing up at the polls on election day. Memories of the Ofelia Ford special election come to mind where Dems spent a ton of money and still almost lost to a Republican candidate with no money and little support in a heavily Democrat district.
Tuesday, June 30, 2009
All a twitter
Just FYI I am not twittering, I do not have any direct association with any Twitter account and have no immediate desire or imminent plans to do so. I think Rep. Barret Rich and Rep. Josh Evans have those areas covered.
Besides, we are out of session now and their are not enough little interesting issues to twitter about. Sorry, my private life is not that interesting. I doubt many people are waiting with baited breath to hear about my latest trip to the hardware store to pick up a box of nails. I may reconsider when session starts back up.
Besides, we are out of session now and their are not enough little interesting issues to twitter about. Sorry, my private life is not that interesting. I doubt many people are waiting with baited breath to hear about my latest trip to the hardware store to pick up a box of nails. I may reconsider when session starts back up.
Monday, June 29, 2009
Hate to say I told you so
But I told you so. A closed Nashville process gets results not wanted by the majority of Tennesseans.
On Sanford
I always wonder why people get so excited about when a conservative has a slip or does something wrong. News flash! People aren't perfect. The last perfect one was nailed to a tree a few thousand years ago. Mark Sanford wasn't the next perfect one and anyone else you had in mind probably isn't perfect either. While we may be shooting for an ideal, We all fall short. Democrat and Republicans alike.
Was it a screw up? You bet. Does it diminish him? Clearly. Will he be a presidential contender? Not any more. Will it cost him his family? While I personally do not approve of his personal actions that is an issue to be discussed between him and his family. Not by the media. Should he step down from office for what he did? To date I have seen nothing that he did that was close to criminal or out and out malfeasance of his official duty. He never lied under oath or anything close. He was off on personal time when the legislature was out of session. Not much going on.
If we asked every legislator who screwed up or screwed around on his wife in the legislature to step down......Well, lets just say the place would be a lot thinner. Just because someone supports a conservative stance, says they are a christian or supports christian values does not suddenly make them perfect. If it did we would not need confessionals in churches. Those thing and issues are goals to be shot for. Philosophies that lead us in a direction we should go for and aspire to. When someone falls short we should try and remember they are humans too.
Was it a screw up? You bet. Does it diminish him? Clearly. Will he be a presidential contender? Not any more. Will it cost him his family? While I personally do not approve of his personal actions that is an issue to be discussed between him and his family. Not by the media. Should he step down from office for what he did? To date I have seen nothing that he did that was close to criminal or out and out malfeasance of his official duty. He never lied under oath or anything close. He was off on personal time when the legislature was out of session. Not much going on.
If we asked every legislator who screwed up or screwed around on his wife in the legislature to step down......Well, lets just say the place would be a lot thinner. Just because someone supports a conservative stance, says they are a christian or supports christian values does not suddenly make them perfect. If it did we would not need confessionals in churches. Those thing and issues are goals to be shot for. Philosophies that lead us in a direction we should go for and aspire to. When someone falls short we should try and remember they are humans too.
Guns in parks becomes a local issue
Gun owners are about to make their voice heard at the local level about the guns in parks legislation. In the past the only people who could more or less allow guns anywhere was the state. The state had a preemptive ban on legal gun owners being able to carry to defend themselves in parks and about everywhere else.
When election time rolled around everyone could be for the second amendment because their was nothing to vote for or against. Now, it will be a local decision and the local officials will have to go on record as some of them go into an election cycle. Will those people who said they supported the constitution still stay as strong as they once said they were or will some tunes change?
It could be interesting.
When election time rolled around everyone could be for the second amendment because their was nothing to vote for or against. Now, it will be a local decision and the local officials will have to go on record as some of them go into an election cycle. Will those people who said they supported the constitution still stay as strong as they once said they were or will some tunes change?
It could be interesting.
Ya make me look moderate
After my first year in the house Rep. Bill Dunn said "Keep up the good work. You make me look moderate". While his positions had not changed the Libs had someone new to hate and focus their anger on. It took some of the pressure off Bill and made his conservative ideas look mainstream. He could start passing some stuff.
Now it is looking like I may have to hand the baton off. While there are a few other freshman still battling for the crown, Freshman Rep. Tony Shipley seems to have some of the libs a little twisted. The press and commenter's are saying he cant pass his conservative legislation. He gets the liberals too angry.
Meanwhile others are reporting I have calmed in my ways and I am passing legislation.
All I can say is...
Keep up the good work. You make me look moderate.
Now it is looking like I may have to hand the baton off. While there are a few other freshman still battling for the crown, Freshman Rep. Tony Shipley seems to have some of the libs a little twisted. The press and commenter's are saying he cant pass his conservative legislation. He gets the liberals too angry.
Meanwhile others are reporting I have calmed in my ways and I am passing legislation.
All I can say is...
Keep up the good work. You make me look moderate.
Saturday, June 27, 2009
Fitting award
The Knox News Sentinel wins an award for advocacy journalism. I guess the editorial staff is proud of it.
Thursday, June 25, 2009
Waxing Williams
G.Q. Drew, Ken Morraro and even Randy Neal Show the love to the Republican legislators and drops the bombs on Kent Williams and others. Even this little blog got a shout out in this Metro Pulse poll of pundits.
Johnson "The biggest impact of Kent Williams’ deal to become Speaker was the suffocating effect of his committee assignments on several pieces of legislation that Republicans should have otherwise been able to pass fairly easily in the House. Having someone who appeared to lack all but the most basic understanding of the legislative process as House Speaker also changed the tone of the legislative session. The House moved along at a snail’s pace, there was no rhythm to the session, and Williams’ incompetence seemed a large factor in the late adjournment date."
Name one legislator that was a stand-out for you this year.
Johnson: Rep. Stacey Campfield (R-Knoxville) and John Mark Windle (D-Livingston). Both men are willing to vote against their parties, putting them at odds with leaders and costing them choice committee assignments and other legislative perks.
They are very different personalities. Windle is a veteran of Iraq who stays away from the press and has always struck me as very quiet and introspective. Campfield, as everyone in Knoxville knows, thrives off of publicity, isn’t afraid to ruffle feathers and uses his blog to expose the seedy underbelly of state politics. But they are alike in their refreshing independence and dedication to their constituents.
Neal: As much as I’d like to name a Democrat, the hero award should probably go to Knoxville Republican Sen. Tim Burchett, who was the lone Republican to vote against rolling back the Voter Confidence Act thus saving it by one vote.
Name one you wished had stayed home.
Johnson: if I have to pick one person who was the worst, let’s go with Sen. Doug Overbey, the unprincipled Maryville Republican who fought tooth and nail to preserve the unconstitutional Tennessee Plan for selecting judges.
Marrero: I’ll give you an answer for the best and the worst. The two speakers. Lt. Gov. Ramsey was the stand-out, and House Speaker Kent Williams shouldn’t have been there at all.
Johnson "The biggest impact of Kent Williams’ deal to become Speaker was the suffocating effect of his committee assignments on several pieces of legislation that Republicans should have otherwise been able to pass fairly easily in the House. Having someone who appeared to lack all but the most basic understanding of the legislative process as House Speaker also changed the tone of the legislative session. The House moved along at a snail’s pace, there was no rhythm to the session, and Williams’ incompetence seemed a large factor in the late adjournment date."
Name one legislator that was a stand-out for you this year.
Johnson: Rep. Stacey Campfield (R-Knoxville) and John Mark Windle (D-Livingston). Both men are willing to vote against their parties, putting them at odds with leaders and costing them choice committee assignments and other legislative perks.
They are very different personalities. Windle is a veteran of Iraq who stays away from the press and has always struck me as very quiet and introspective. Campfield, as everyone in Knoxville knows, thrives off of publicity, isn’t afraid to ruffle feathers and uses his blog to expose the seedy underbelly of state politics. But they are alike in their refreshing independence and dedication to their constituents.
Neal: As much as I’d like to name a Democrat, the hero award should probably go to Knoxville Republican Sen. Tim Burchett, who was the lone Republican to vote against rolling back the Voter Confidence Act thus saving it by one vote.
Name one you wished had stayed home.
Johnson: if I have to pick one person who was the worst, let’s go with Sen. Doug Overbey, the unprincipled Maryville Republican who fought tooth and nail to preserve the unconstitutional Tennessee Plan for selecting judges.
Marrero: I’ll give you an answer for the best and the worst. The two speakers. Lt. Gov. Ramsey was the stand-out, and House Speaker Kent Williams shouldn’t have been there at all.
Megga want
Frank Cagle tells the tale of two "Megga sites". No, not the one we are spending hundreds of millions of dollars to develope in West Tennessee but two that sit already developed and unused in East Tennessee.
Wednesday, June 24, 2009
Carry on campus
Another call to let the voices be heard. Funny how those two amendments go together. Lose the 2nd amendment and the first is not far behind.
Tuesday, June 23, 2009
Ron's hope
As has been widely reported Ron Ramsey and two Democrat candidates had some gubernatorial wind taken out of their sails when the bill allowing them to raise funds for a gubernatorial run while in session failed on the last day of session.
But all hope for the candidates and would be candidates is not lost. A piece of compromise legislation could be passed in the opening weeks of session and put into effect within a month or so. No real fund raising time could be lost.
I think for Ramsey to have a shot it is a near necessity.
Some people think it is no big deal. A good candidate can beat the money. Six months is plenty of time.
While money shouldn't be a factor for a campaign, at that level it is. Local races you can win door to door. Handshake to handshake. Good message, good plan, solid local history, Hard work, some money and it can be done.
In my opinion to be considered credible in a state wide Republican primary race a candidate needs to raise 2 million dollars at least. In their US senate run Van Hillary and Ed Bryant each were able to raise about a million bucks. Both had solid messages, worked hard and had a good base of support, but the lack of money were probably their campaigns death blow more then any other factor. A million wont get the message out any more. You can shake every hand you can, you can go to every function work as hard as you can and it wont be enough. Their just isn't enough time. Two million could get the message out and won't be bulled under.
Corker did what Bredesen started and what Haslem will try to do also. He did what the other candidates did plus he dropped millions of his own / his families money on his race. He came from relative obscurity to win handily against what started out as a race against two better known state wide candidates. Was his message that much better? Not really. All three said the same thing more or less. They were the conservative. Corker was just able to say it a lot more times to a lot more people. Van and Ed could not come up with the dough to fight back show differences or push their message forward. The difference in money mattered. Van and Ed combined probably barely hit $2 mill. Combine their numbers they got close to but still did not get over 50% of the vote. That is where I get the 2 million dollar minimum number from.
A legislator can get donations of $7,500 or two thousand for an individual. The funding limits were set in place by Democrats years ago to limit the fundraising potential of Republicans. Corporations are not allowed to donate at all. Why? They donate the majority of time to Republicans and Republican causes. Unions (Who donate to Democrats mostly) have no such limits. While it sounds like a lot of money, for the big seats, 7,500.00 or even $10,000.00 is nothing. Very few PACS or individuals will drop that kind of dough anyway no matter who it is for. When you need to come up with millions it is a drop in the bucket. It takes a lot of drops to fill the bucket and the rain falls slow.
In a state wide race all the big players are credible officeholders. No one has a huge advantage over the other. They will all get donations from their already established contacts. While out of session (about 6 months) all the candidates will be hitting up their supporters and some of the same people with deep pockets. Ramseys strength is also his weakness. Win or lose he is a high powered officeholder. His donors win no matter what. When session starts up though its another story. He is the only candidate who will be barred from raising money.
In six month their is only so much time to ask so many people for a donation. Short of a game changer issue (Like three plus dollar a gallon gas), If a candidate can not hit the two million dollar mark to go head to head with someone willing to drop 3 or 4 million, in addition to what they raise outside, it is almost an impossible task. With limits on donation size, limited amount of time someone can get donations and no personal wealth I would say if Ramsey can't break at least the million two/million three mark by the time session starts or if he can not quickly change the ban on donations during session then by this time next year it will be all but too late for him. He will not be able to raise 3/4 million dollars in two months and campaign at the same time. Their are just not enough hours in the day.
But all hope for the candidates and would be candidates is not lost. A piece of compromise legislation could be passed in the opening weeks of session and put into effect within a month or so. No real fund raising time could be lost.
I think for Ramsey to have a shot it is a near necessity.
Some people think it is no big deal. A good candidate can beat the money. Six months is plenty of time.
While money shouldn't be a factor for a campaign, at that level it is. Local races you can win door to door. Handshake to handshake. Good message, good plan, solid local history, Hard work, some money and it can be done.
In my opinion to be considered credible in a state wide Republican primary race a candidate needs to raise 2 million dollars at least. In their US senate run Van Hillary and Ed Bryant each were able to raise about a million bucks. Both had solid messages, worked hard and had a good base of support, but the lack of money were probably their campaigns death blow more then any other factor. A million wont get the message out any more. You can shake every hand you can, you can go to every function work as hard as you can and it wont be enough. Their just isn't enough time. Two million could get the message out and won't be bulled under.
Corker did what Bredesen started and what Haslem will try to do also. He did what the other candidates did plus he dropped millions of his own / his families money on his race. He came from relative obscurity to win handily against what started out as a race against two better known state wide candidates. Was his message that much better? Not really. All three said the same thing more or less. They were the conservative. Corker was just able to say it a lot more times to a lot more people. Van and Ed could not come up with the dough to fight back show differences or push their message forward. The difference in money mattered. Van and Ed combined probably barely hit $2 mill. Combine their numbers they got close to but still did not get over 50% of the vote. That is where I get the 2 million dollar minimum number from.
A legislator can get donations of $7,500 or two thousand for an individual. The funding limits were set in place by Democrats years ago to limit the fundraising potential of Republicans. Corporations are not allowed to donate at all. Why? They donate the majority of time to Republicans and Republican causes. Unions (Who donate to Democrats mostly) have no such limits. While it sounds like a lot of money, for the big seats, 7,500.00 or even $10,000.00 is nothing. Very few PACS or individuals will drop that kind of dough anyway no matter who it is for. When you need to come up with millions it is a drop in the bucket. It takes a lot of drops to fill the bucket and the rain falls slow.
In a state wide race all the big players are credible officeholders. No one has a huge advantage over the other. They will all get donations from their already established contacts. While out of session (about 6 months) all the candidates will be hitting up their supporters and some of the same people with deep pockets. Ramseys strength is also his weakness. Win or lose he is a high powered officeholder. His donors win no matter what. When session starts up though its another story. He is the only candidate who will be barred from raising money.
In six month their is only so much time to ask so many people for a donation. Short of a game changer issue (Like three plus dollar a gallon gas), If a candidate can not hit the two million dollar mark to go head to head with someone willing to drop 3 or 4 million, in addition to what they raise outside, it is almost an impossible task. With limits on donation size, limited amount of time someone can get donations and no personal wealth I would say if Ramsey can't break at least the million two/million three mark by the time session starts or if he can not quickly change the ban on donations during session then by this time next year it will be all but too late for him. He will not be able to raise 3/4 million dollars in two months and campaign at the same time. Their are just not enough hours in the day.
Sunday, June 21, 2009
Snake handeling
A friend once told me a story of a man who owned a talking poisonous snake. The man loved the snake. He talked to it, fed it daily, petted it, gave it a nice clean cage and so fourth. Things were going along swimmingly. One day as the man was reaching down to pick up the snake, the snake turned around its head and bit its owner a deadly bight.
Lying on the ground writhing in pain about to die the owner asked the snake "I treated you nice, I cared for you. I did about everything I could for you. Why did you bight me?"
The snake replied "I am a snake. What did you expect?!"
More on this story from
Tom Humphreys
Lying on the ground writhing in pain about to die the owner asked the snake "I treated you nice, I cared for you. I did about everything I could for you. Why did you bight me?"
The snake replied "I am a snake. What did you expect?!"
More on this story from
Tom Humphreys
Looking forward/ Mom's always right
With session over and a look back complete I am ready to put the heat, tension and frustration from last year behind me. It is time to look forward to the hope and possibilities for next year.
It is time to get out my political crystal ball and look forward a few months.
I predict the top issues for next year could be.....
The economy
I know, I know, no big shocker there. I don't expect unemployment to fall in the next 6 months If anything I expect it to go higher. As the job market stays flat I expect people will start to ask where the jobs are and who has them. When that happens a I expect a renewed push on...
illegal aliens
The stories of the poor illegal alien working hard at his job will be drowned out by the stories of the poor legal Tennessean who cant find a job. This issue could get the lift it deserved two years ago.
Pork
With the economy down and Tennessee a sales tax state I expect state revenue to be down as well. The second and final year of the "Stimulus" money will keep some projects going but, short of going to the well of debt, next year could be a real opportunity to cut some pork out of the budget. Projects that are not dire better hang on tight. Nonprofits, grant monies to non essential entities better get ready to look at the knife. Small businesses that can perform needed state functions or take over failing government projects could get a second look.
Guns
While there is still work to be done, most of the big issues have been covered. Campus carry, licencing issues and reproduction of permit holders names will get a look but I don't expect them to be the issues that rule the papers like the gun issues did this year.
Education
Higher ed
As times get tough the state expects its potentially self funding institutions to act more and more like private institutions. I think state higher ed knows lean times are coming. The state has been reluctant to give money to higher ed for some time. One of the top knocks on state higher ed is their thick upper level management. It has been that way for years. Legislators say privately "When higher ed gets money they just give it to some %$#@ vice president" That is why you often see the state fund capitol projects for higher ed. Capitol projects mean jobs.
If higher ed does not continue to restructure itself the state may step in and force the issue. Private schools may have a more balanced playing field.
K-12
I don't expect to see big changes except possibly on some social issues. I think Knox county acceptance of gay websites on school computers may be the straw that broke the camel's back. Home school and private schools could get a bump on sevral issues as well. I don't expect more money coming into the state system but that could change depending on.....
Pre K
This could be a battle year for the governors legacy project. The battle could ensue over pre K or K-12 funding. Who will get the money? The argument for pre K is weak. The governors own study says it does not work. It was sold as a product of lottery funds not general budget.
Health care
Who know how this will go. Obama is seeing the price tag of socialized medicine now. A scaled back version will be similar to Cover Tennessee. Very little for a lot of people. No one seems to like or want that. I think most people see state health care as acceptable for the most dire desperate of people. Not for the general population. If Obama goes the rout similar to Tennessee things could go into flux for Tennessee's health care dollars. Medical savings accounts are still looking like the way to go from my point of view. It has the best of both worlds but I think that one will take someone in a new administration with a fresh eye for real positive change.
Roads and bridges The next few years we will be funding faster then we have companies to build what we have funded for. While roads are labor intensive they are also capitol intensive to start. expect lots of big expensive road projects to start.
Crime, punishment and rehabilitation
Most crimes that need real prison type punishment are not going to get it. The state finds those things too expensive. Expect more criminal acts to become civil penalties. I think Tennessee needs to take a long hard look at all the acts that are or could become felonious and start prioritizing a little better. Not that other crimes aren't bad but it seems to me that direct physical crimes against humans should get top priority for prison time.
It is time to get out my political crystal ball and look forward a few months.
I predict the top issues for next year could be.....
The economy
I know, I know, no big shocker there. I don't expect unemployment to fall in the next 6 months If anything I expect it to go higher. As the job market stays flat I expect people will start to ask where the jobs are and who has them. When that happens a I expect a renewed push on...
illegal aliens
The stories of the poor illegal alien working hard at his job will be drowned out by the stories of the poor legal Tennessean who cant find a job. This issue could get the lift it deserved two years ago.
Pork
With the economy down and Tennessee a sales tax state I expect state revenue to be down as well. The second and final year of the "Stimulus" money will keep some projects going but, short of going to the well of debt, next year could be a real opportunity to cut some pork out of the budget. Projects that are not dire better hang on tight. Nonprofits, grant monies to non essential entities better get ready to look at the knife. Small businesses that can perform needed state functions or take over failing government projects could get a second look.
Guns
While there is still work to be done, most of the big issues have been covered. Campus carry, licencing issues and reproduction of permit holders names will get a look but I don't expect them to be the issues that rule the papers like the gun issues did this year.
Education
Higher ed
As times get tough the state expects its potentially self funding institutions to act more and more like private institutions. I think state higher ed knows lean times are coming. The state has been reluctant to give money to higher ed for some time. One of the top knocks on state higher ed is their thick upper level management. It has been that way for years. Legislators say privately "When higher ed gets money they just give it to some %$#@ vice president" That is why you often see the state fund capitol projects for higher ed. Capitol projects mean jobs.
If higher ed does not continue to restructure itself the state may step in and force the issue. Private schools may have a more balanced playing field.
K-12
I don't expect to see big changes except possibly on some social issues. I think Knox county acceptance of gay websites on school computers may be the straw that broke the camel's back. Home school and private schools could get a bump on sevral issues as well. I don't expect more money coming into the state system but that could change depending on.....
Pre K
This could be a battle year for the governors legacy project. The battle could ensue over pre K or K-12 funding. Who will get the money? The argument for pre K is weak. The governors own study says it does not work. It was sold as a product of lottery funds not general budget.
Health care
Who know how this will go. Obama is seeing the price tag of socialized medicine now. A scaled back version will be similar to Cover Tennessee. Very little for a lot of people. No one seems to like or want that. I think most people see state health care as acceptable for the most dire desperate of people. Not for the general population. If Obama goes the rout similar to Tennessee things could go into flux for Tennessee's health care dollars. Medical savings accounts are still looking like the way to go from my point of view. It has the best of both worlds but I think that one will take someone in a new administration with a fresh eye for real positive change.
Roads and bridges The next few years we will be funding faster then we have companies to build what we have funded for. While roads are labor intensive they are also capitol intensive to start. expect lots of big expensive road projects to start.
Crime, punishment and rehabilitation
Most crimes that need real prison type punishment are not going to get it. The state finds those things too expensive. Expect more criminal acts to become civil penalties. I think Tennessee needs to take a long hard look at all the acts that are or could become felonious and start prioritizing a little better. Not that other crimes aren't bad but it seems to me that direct physical crimes against humans should get top priority for prison time.
Saturday, June 20, 2009
The Phil
When I did my last post on winners and losers I honestly forgot one person.
The governor. Phil Bredesen (AKA the Ghost).
How could I forget him? It was easy. He was not much of a factor at all. He probably wins as the biggest political loser this year. He is the lamest of lame ducks. Not only he is going into his final year, but it is almost as if he is calling attention to his lameness.
The first smack was after his shameless sucking up to Obama in hopes of a HHS job, he got stiff armed by "The One" to kick the year off. Now, he is getting steamrolled constantly even by his own party on issues after issue (See gun veto and too many others topics to list).
He is now being used as a bad example for the health care plan he did implement.
He does not communicate well, if at all, with the people who need to know what he is doing.
He failed to present a budget until the 11th hour, yet he took no real steps to fix any growing problems on the budget. Yes, his budget passed pretty much intact but that was more a case of too many chefs ruining a soup. In the end the five chefs opened up the cold can of Campbell's soup and shoved it to the waiter.
How does it all end for Phil?
I expect in his final year he will stay on the world tour of "Trade negotiations/business recruitment". In the past he has had some success with giving away the farm to get a cow. I imagine he will try and continue this path but with the piggy bank getting light I don't see the success he had in the past continuing without passing on some big debt. Of course that has been his M.O. his entire political career.
The governor. Phil Bredesen (AKA the Ghost).
How could I forget him? It was easy. He was not much of a factor at all. He probably wins as the biggest political loser this year. He is the lamest of lame ducks. Not only he is going into his final year, but it is almost as if he is calling attention to his lameness.
The first smack was after his shameless sucking up to Obama in hopes of a HHS job, he got stiff armed by "The One" to kick the year off. Now, he is getting steamrolled constantly even by his own party on issues after issue (See gun veto and too many others topics to list).
He is now being used as a bad example for the health care plan he did implement.
He does not communicate well, if at all, with the people who need to know what he is doing.
He failed to present a budget until the 11th hour, yet he took no real steps to fix any growing problems on the budget. Yes, his budget passed pretty much intact but that was more a case of too many chefs ruining a soup. In the end the five chefs opened up the cold can of Campbell's soup and shoved it to the waiter.
How does it all end for Phil?
I expect in his final year he will stay on the world tour of "Trade negotiations/business recruitment". In the past he has had some success with giving away the farm to get a cow. I imagine he will try and continue this path but with the piggy bank getting light I don't see the success he had in the past continuing without passing on some big debt. Of course that has been his M.O. his entire political career.
Friday, June 19, 2009
Winners and losers
The who's who, who did what and who had what done to them.
Ron Ramsey
A good election cycle had him starting off like a winner. He jumped in on governors race and got stronger. Slips up on voting rights for citizens on judicial offices (Was for it before he was against it) and an alternate budget that never got out of first gear before the tranny fell out, set him back. A tough nail is losing the right to raise money for his governor run while in session. If this does not pass early next year it could kill his run for the big seat.
Senate Democrats
Not a real issue on any issue except where weak Republicans made their unified numbers strong. I have to give them credit, Dems know how to keep their people together and on message.
Senate Republicans
All over the place. They talked like they were the cock of the walk early but could not keep it together when it counted on key issues. It could just be a problem of being new to leading. I think (hope) it will get better in time but I think some screws need to turn.
Senate Republican freshman
I was quite impressed with one. One did about as well as expected. One was a little worse than expected. One I expected to be bad but was a disaster.
In the house
Kent Williams
Did about what everyone expected. I guess he got his payday.
Jayson Mumpower
Took a hard hit to start. Swallowed his pride and worked to help Kent Williams for the good of the state. I am not sure if he got his feat back under him and am not sure he knows how to yet. The caucus work seemed to go back seat. I think he got caught up in the budget and trying to make a consensus. Dealing with what he had and the people around him I don't know if he could do much better. Negotiations are difficult between two or three people (Governor, Lt. Governor, House speaker) A five way negotiation (Governor, Lt Governor, House speaker, minority/majority leader and his own party goals) had to have Mumps wishing he had hair to pull out.
Glen Casada
Started slow (I think he got caught up in the budget mess as well) but got much better at the end of the year.
House Republicans
The bad news is we are called "The 6 tribes of Israel wondering separately in the desert" by the Democrats. I can't disagree with that title much. We are fractured and I wonder how much some members even want to be part of the team. The good news is the conservatives are the largest tribe and are growing. Most of the freshmen are conservatives and some can really be great. I am much impressed with the frosh class.
Big Republican winner
A two way battle. Jerold McCormic did better then most expected. He gets bonus points for nearly beating the crap out of Kent Williams at the end of the year. Beth Harwell moved up as well. Usually about mute, she got a big piece of republican legislation through with charter schools and could make waves if restructuring of higher ed administration really happens. Could a caucus leadership power play be in the future?
Democrat leadership
Gary Odum
Pulled off the coup of the year sticking the knife in Naifeh (and probably his party)by getting Williams elected but blew it by bragging. Not much of a deep thinker, clearly, but cut throat mean to the bone. Some times I think he protests just because he wants to attack something. Most people on our side wonder if he even knows what he is yelling about half the time. He looks like a pariah in his own party right now but anyone that ruthless is not to be underestimated.
Jimmy Naifeh
We all thought he was toast at the beginning of the year but he hung on and came back. I don't think he is where he was but he is climbing back in the ring and showing he still has a claw or two.
Mike Turner
He has a tough job. He works to corral/ beat into submission all the loons on the left and be a parrot for Garry Odum. That has got to suck. Mike is a good guy but I honestly worry about his health. The stress showed greatly on my big friend by the end of the year.
Democrat party
Clearly they are in transition, They are completely befuddled when they don't win every vote and their brutality no longer works. To some of them it is like they just can't believe it and they don't know how to handle it. Some are flowing with the new stream (Hank Fincher comes to mind) Some were there all along (Ben West, John Deberry, Charlie Curtis and John Mark Wendle). Some just need to go to the house and let some fresh blood and new ideas in. If ever there was a party in need of change it is the Tennessee Democrats. When I talk to some of them I honestly feel like I am stepping back into 1967. It's time to let it go.
Ron Ramsey
A good election cycle had him starting off like a winner. He jumped in on governors race and got stronger. Slips up on voting rights for citizens on judicial offices (Was for it before he was against it) and an alternate budget that never got out of first gear before the tranny fell out, set him back. A tough nail is losing the right to raise money for his governor run while in session. If this does not pass early next year it could kill his run for the big seat.
Senate Democrats
Not a real issue on any issue except where weak Republicans made their unified numbers strong. I have to give them credit, Dems know how to keep their people together and on message.
Senate Republicans
All over the place. They talked like they were the cock of the walk early but could not keep it together when it counted on key issues. It could just be a problem of being new to leading. I think (hope) it will get better in time but I think some screws need to turn.
Senate Republican freshman
I was quite impressed with one. One did about as well as expected. One was a little worse than expected. One I expected to be bad but was a disaster.
In the house
Kent Williams
Did about what everyone expected. I guess he got his payday.
Jayson Mumpower
Took a hard hit to start. Swallowed his pride and worked to help Kent Williams for the good of the state. I am not sure if he got his feat back under him and am not sure he knows how to yet. The caucus work seemed to go back seat. I think he got caught up in the budget and trying to make a consensus. Dealing with what he had and the people around him I don't know if he could do much better. Negotiations are difficult between two or three people (Governor, Lt. Governor, House speaker) A five way negotiation (Governor, Lt Governor, House speaker, minority/majority leader and his own party goals) had to have Mumps wishing he had hair to pull out.
Glen Casada
Started slow (I think he got caught up in the budget mess as well) but got much better at the end of the year.
House Republicans
The bad news is we are called "The 6 tribes of Israel wondering separately in the desert" by the Democrats. I can't disagree with that title much. We are fractured and I wonder how much some members even want to be part of the team. The good news is the conservatives are the largest tribe and are growing. Most of the freshmen are conservatives and some can really be great. I am much impressed with the frosh class.
Big Republican winner
A two way battle. Jerold McCormic did better then most expected. He gets bonus points for nearly beating the crap out of Kent Williams at the end of the year. Beth Harwell moved up as well. Usually about mute, she got a big piece of republican legislation through with charter schools and could make waves if restructuring of higher ed administration really happens. Could a caucus leadership power play be in the future?
Democrat leadership
Gary Odum
Pulled off the coup of the year sticking the knife in Naifeh (and probably his party)by getting Williams elected but blew it by bragging. Not much of a deep thinker, clearly, but cut throat mean to the bone. Some times I think he protests just because he wants to attack something. Most people on our side wonder if he even knows what he is yelling about half the time. He looks like a pariah in his own party right now but anyone that ruthless is not to be underestimated.
Jimmy Naifeh
We all thought he was toast at the beginning of the year but he hung on and came back. I don't think he is where he was but he is climbing back in the ring and showing he still has a claw or two.
Mike Turner
He has a tough job. He works to corral/ beat into submission all the loons on the left and be a parrot for Garry Odum. That has got to suck. Mike is a good guy but I honestly worry about his health. The stress showed greatly on my big friend by the end of the year.
Democrat party
Clearly they are in transition, They are completely befuddled when they don't win every vote and their brutality no longer works. To some of them it is like they just can't believe it and they don't know how to handle it. Some are flowing with the new stream (Hank Fincher comes to mind) Some were there all along (Ben West, John Deberry, Charlie Curtis and John Mark Wendle). Some just need to go to the house and let some fresh blood and new ideas in. If ever there was a party in need of change it is the Tennessee Democrats. When I talk to some of them I honestly feel like I am stepping back into 1967. It's time to let it go.
Winners and losers
Who won the battles in the legislature this year. This is my point of view on the issues. I will do people later.
Education
Slight edge Republicans
Dems keep an expanded failing pre K program, Republicans win on charter schools. Republicans would have lost charter schools as well if it wasn't for the easy stimulus money (100 million) Dems were in lock down and had it killed. When the media started to pick up on the money lost the story changed.
Judges
Democrats win in a landslide.
An all but complete collapse had many thinking a deal was cut for something else. That something else never materialized.
Illegal immigration and election reform
Democrats win
Holding the line and doing nothing was a victory. Stalemate is a win for them.
Guns
Wash.
You may say "What? Republicans won that hands down!" Yes and no. Republicans got the issues passed we have wanted to pass for years but many Democrats were sick and tired of being beat up by the gun owners election after election. That wont happen again. Those who hate the gun issue made a ton of noise to make Republicans look extreme and wont be hurt by the gun owners anyway.
Taxes
Wash. Possible Democrat victory.
Tax increases on small businesses unemployment, several fee increases and a lot of other business taxes get a bump. No broad tax increases so most people will not notice the tax increases immediately.
The budget.
Democrats in a landslide.
They got about everything they wanted. Republicans failed to hold a hard line on any big issue. Triggers making the governor cut when revenues don't make projections was the only possible victory but I can imagine what districts will get cut when it happens.
Staff
Republicans
Having the constitutional officers is a huge change we at least know what the numbers are in an honest way. Getting election coordinators slowly but surely will pay off big long term. Dems keep control of most of the rest of the staff thanks to Kent Williams.
Regulation
Dems in a shocker
I was expecting so much more on this issue. Republicans started out strong. Some deregulation occurred in the area of streams by just getting clear definition of what a stream is.
On other issues it looked like we were as bad or worse then our competition. We went with most of the regulation Obama wanted. Energy mandates and regulation on construction took huge jumps. Giving the government private health care information passed. Limits on who could run for offices serve as a volunteer firefighter or constable passed, losses on coal mining and other issues gave dems the clear edge by year end.
Education
Slight edge Republicans
Dems keep an expanded failing pre K program, Republicans win on charter schools. Republicans would have lost charter schools as well if it wasn't for the easy stimulus money (100 million) Dems were in lock down and had it killed. When the media started to pick up on the money lost the story changed.
Judges
Democrats win in a landslide.
An all but complete collapse had many thinking a deal was cut for something else. That something else never materialized.
Illegal immigration and election reform
Democrats win
Holding the line and doing nothing was a victory. Stalemate is a win for them.
Guns
Wash.
You may say "What? Republicans won that hands down!" Yes and no. Republicans got the issues passed we have wanted to pass for years but many Democrats were sick and tired of being beat up by the gun owners election after election. That wont happen again. Those who hate the gun issue made a ton of noise to make Republicans look extreme and wont be hurt by the gun owners anyway.
Taxes
Wash. Possible Democrat victory.
Tax increases on small businesses unemployment, several fee increases and a lot of other business taxes get a bump. No broad tax increases so most people will not notice the tax increases immediately.
The budget.
Democrats in a landslide.
They got about everything they wanted. Republicans failed to hold a hard line on any big issue. Triggers making the governor cut when revenues don't make projections was the only possible victory but I can imagine what districts will get cut when it happens.
Staff
Republicans
Having the constitutional officers is a huge change we at least know what the numbers are in an honest way. Getting election coordinators slowly but surely will pay off big long term. Dems keep control of most of the rest of the staff thanks to Kent Williams.
Regulation
Dems in a shocker
I was expecting so much more on this issue. Republicans started out strong. Some deregulation occurred in the area of streams by just getting clear definition of what a stream is.
On other issues it looked like we were as bad or worse then our competition. We went with most of the regulation Obama wanted. Energy mandates and regulation on construction took huge jumps. Giving the government private health care information passed. Limits on who could run for offices serve as a volunteer firefighter or constable passed, losses on coal mining and other issues gave dems the clear edge by year end.
Negotiations and love songs
Sometimes I get frustrated with my party. Because we are evil mean and heartless like we are portrait by our opponents and the media?
No.
Because we are too nice with our opponents. Not that I don't get along with some of them. I do. When not talking issues or philosophy many of them are quite nice. But when it comes time to push ideas and philosophy forward many times the philosophy's go in completely different directions.
When those issues come up our party many times forgets to battle in the media and instead always try to make friends. We go straight to compromise. Really most of the time we start out in compromise and equivocate down to non significance.
On constitutional rights we are pretty strong. The wimpyness is most evident in economic issues. This year is a perfect example. Lets just look at the last few weeks of headlines and quotable quotes.
Democrats:
Governor presents a pork laden plan full of tax increases and new deficit spending of money we don't have for projects we cant afford now or later. Crazy cuts to the sick and mentally ill. Re occurring costs on a proven failing project (Pre K) while leaving money in the lottery piggy bank for who knows what.
Republicans:
You would think these are easy slam dunk winners for Republican talking points. It started ok with Mumpower and his credit card analogy. After that it all but collapsed.
Instead of drawing a line in the sand and then leaving it to the governor to figure out Republicans try to be helpful by coming up with plans to partially eliminate some tax increases and fight against some deficit spending. Very middle ground stuff.
Democrats:
Yell, scream and shift blame. "Your plan is stupid!" "We will fight you to the end on your evil plan!" "You will have to vote on every evil heartless cut!" "We will shut this place down if we don't get our way" "We will veto"
Republicans:
We have a few options at that point. Fight and point out the failings of the governors original plan. Fight to defend our plan or collapse and run away from it. More or less admitting we are what they say we are.
Republican response: "Well, it is just a starting point".
Collapse.
It hits committee and what happens? more collapse. Repubs drop about all cuts but vote to move the bill forward. Taking ownership of the governors cuts and pork.
Democrats:
Yell and scream more and again all vote against the budget. They distance themselves from the plan. They make it all us with their goals.
I ask the higher ups why we don't fight fire with fire. Pull out the pork on the governors budget and make the dems vote to keep it. Drew Johnson gave a list a mile long. Use that as a starting point. Have it offset some of our plans. If not that, put it against some of the governors cuts to the sick and mentally ill. Make the governor pay for his spending with current money. Be willing to go into shutdown. Make him find the pork. Those are winning votes either way.
Our response
We cant do that. They will take some of our members and pass what they want. (Admitted some of our members are completely weak, but we let them be. Our leadership has little to no hand.) My response is they will do that anyway. At least then they have ownership of the cuts and pork again.
Another fear is it wont look dignified or statesmanlike to fight. Some people are more worried about how they might look instead of how the budget looks. They are so worried about being liked as they rush to pass a budget quickly. They fear looking bad more then they realize they could look good. They forget what it is they need to do and how it really looks. They forget people want a fighter for good small government. Not a lot of books or history written about "The great compromises of Tennessee" or "Compromise your way to the top". The state already has been compromised. That is why we are where we are. That is not why we have been put in charge. That is not why people voted for us.
Democrats never forget the war in the media. The reality of the perception. They have taken a terrible budget, handed it to us, intimidated us into not making it much better and will later (when it all falls apart) blame us for being in charge when passing it.
I often wonder how this would work in real life. If the governor handed us a steaming pile of pig excrement on a paper plate I think we would take it. If we decided to spray some Lysol on it the Dems would yell how we hate farmers and want to poison the environment. They take another plate full and throw it at us. Intimidated. Instead of handing the pile back to its rightful owner or throwing it back we would then carry it to our office and put it on our receptionists desk to show we aren't that bad of people and love pigs. When our constituents start to complain about the overpowering smell we then try to shift the conversation about how nice we are and how our ideas are better. Constitution! constitution! We yell. We keep some, but for some reason a chunk of our constituents go to hang out at the other sides offices that don't smell.
No.
Because we are too nice with our opponents. Not that I don't get along with some of them. I do. When not talking issues or philosophy many of them are quite nice. But when it comes time to push ideas and philosophy forward many times the philosophy's go in completely different directions.
When those issues come up our party many times forgets to battle in the media and instead always try to make friends. We go straight to compromise. Really most of the time we start out in compromise and equivocate down to non significance.
On constitutional rights we are pretty strong. The wimpyness is most evident in economic issues. This year is a perfect example. Lets just look at the last few weeks of headlines and quotable quotes.
Democrats:
Governor presents a pork laden plan full of tax increases and new deficit spending of money we don't have for projects we cant afford now or later. Crazy cuts to the sick and mentally ill. Re occurring costs on a proven failing project (Pre K) while leaving money in the lottery piggy bank for who knows what.
Republicans:
You would think these are easy slam dunk winners for Republican talking points. It started ok with Mumpower and his credit card analogy. After that it all but collapsed.
Instead of drawing a line in the sand and then leaving it to the governor to figure out Republicans try to be helpful by coming up with plans to partially eliminate some tax increases and fight against some deficit spending. Very middle ground stuff.
Democrats:
Yell, scream and shift blame. "Your plan is stupid!" "We will fight you to the end on your evil plan!" "You will have to vote on every evil heartless cut!" "We will shut this place down if we don't get our way" "We will veto"
Republicans:
We have a few options at that point. Fight and point out the failings of the governors original plan. Fight to defend our plan or collapse and run away from it. More or less admitting we are what they say we are.
Republican response: "Well, it is just a starting point".
Collapse.
It hits committee and what happens? more collapse. Repubs drop about all cuts but vote to move the bill forward. Taking ownership of the governors cuts and pork.
Democrats:
Yell and scream more and again all vote against the budget. They distance themselves from the plan. They make it all us with their goals.
I ask the higher ups why we don't fight fire with fire. Pull out the pork on the governors budget and make the dems vote to keep it. Drew Johnson gave a list a mile long. Use that as a starting point. Have it offset some of our plans. If not that, put it against some of the governors cuts to the sick and mentally ill. Make the governor pay for his spending with current money. Be willing to go into shutdown. Make him find the pork. Those are winning votes either way.
Our response
We cant do that. They will take some of our members and pass what they want. (Admitted some of our members are completely weak, but we let them be. Our leadership has little to no hand.) My response is they will do that anyway. At least then they have ownership of the cuts and pork again.
Another fear is it wont look dignified or statesmanlike to fight. Some people are more worried about how they might look instead of how the budget looks. They are so worried about being liked as they rush to pass a budget quickly. They fear looking bad more then they realize they could look good. They forget what it is they need to do and how it really looks. They forget people want a fighter for good small government. Not a lot of books or history written about "The great compromises of Tennessee" or "Compromise your way to the top". The state already has been compromised. That is why we are where we are. That is not why we have been put in charge. That is not why people voted for us.
Democrats never forget the war in the media. The reality of the perception. They have taken a terrible budget, handed it to us, intimidated us into not making it much better and will later (when it all falls apart) blame us for being in charge when passing it.
I often wonder how this would work in real life. If the governor handed us a steaming pile of pig excrement on a paper plate I think we would take it. If we decided to spray some Lysol on it the Dems would yell how we hate farmers and want to poison the environment. They take another plate full and throw it at us. Intimidated. Instead of handing the pile back to its rightful owner or throwing it back we would then carry it to our office and put it on our receptionists desk to show we aren't that bad of people and love pigs. When our constituents start to complain about the overpowering smell we then try to shift the conversation about how nice we are and how our ideas are better. Constitution! constitution! We yell. We keep some, but for some reason a chunk of our constituents go to hang out at the other sides offices that don't smell.
Thursday, June 18, 2009
Baby dady bill killed
The bill to allow a person found not to be the father of a child through DNA testing to stop paying future child support parents was killed in judicial sub committee of the senate. If you find out its not your child you still may have to pay.
S. Cal. Comm. 5/27/2009
Failed
Ayes................................................4
Noes................................................2
Present and not voting.......................2
Senators voting aye were: Beavers, Black, Bunch, Stanley -- 4.
Senators voting no were: Kyle, Marrero B -- 2.
Senators present and not voting were: Faulk, Overbey -- 2.
S. Cal. Comm. 5/27/2009
Failed
Ayes................................................4
Noes................................................2
Present and not voting.......................2
Senators voting aye were: Beavers, Black, Bunch, Stanley -- 4.
Senators voting no were: Kyle, Marrero B -- 2.
Senators present and not voting were: Faulk, Overbey -- 2.
Hulk in the house
Lou Ferrigno (The Incredible Hulk) is in the state house. I always thought he got robbed at the Olimpia masters so I told him so. He said he agreed 100%.
Charter schools passes
79-15-5 after the debate Tommy Brown got up and commented how upset she was that the Democrat caucus made her change her vote to kill the bill originally.
Gitmo vote
A resolution telling congress we don't want any Gitmo prisoners in Tennessee passed 84 for it 3 nos and 12 present or not voting.
Wednesday, June 17, 2009
Planned Parenthood defunded, sort of
Planned parenthood no longer gets first dibs on about one million dollars of state money. Local health clinics get first dibs then it goes out to private clinics if they don't want it.
Budget better
The compromise on the budget is better. It puts triggers on spending if revenue does not meet expectations. It is still not good in that it bonds a lot of debt and we are using one time money on re occurring costs. About 30 Republicans will vote for it. It still is way better then the old house budget that I must say was a complete piece of garbage that I could not support under any circumstances. The new budget is bad but not disaster waiting to happen.
"I am ready for my close up Mr Demille"
I love it when it comes around. Is CNN coming around the corner or possibly the TNDP going to call for a firing?
I am ready.
I am ready.
The Jimmy Naifeh Center for Effective Leadership
One of the budget amendments sets up The Jimmy Naifeh Center for Effective Leadership at the University of Tennessee .
Its stated goal will be to "Prepare elected and appointed officials for the challenges of serving the public ; to provide leadership and the management programing for government officials from across the state and the nation ; and to provide studies and research in public service on any and all matters relating to the development of professional skills to enhance effectiveness as representatives of the people"
The name Winfield Dunn sounds a little more palatable to me.
Its stated goal will be to "Prepare elected and appointed officials for the challenges of serving the public ; to provide leadership and the management programing for government officials from across the state and the nation ; and to provide studies and research in public service on any and all matters relating to the development of professional skills to enhance effectiveness as representatives of the people"
The name Winfield Dunn sounds a little more palatable to me.
Tuesday, June 16, 2009
Finger pulled
The finger printing of suspected traffic offenders is dead for the year!!
This is awesome news. I thought it was on a fast track for passage when it came out of the house with little dissent. Hat tip to Katie Kumari who picked up the little story and first reported on it. Another big tip of the hat goes to Nicole Young from the Tennessean who did a big story on it and got it out to a large and not to happy public. You people all came on strong and made your voice heard with letters, e mails and calls.
From there it was DOA.
Pat yourself on the back. Job well done!
This is awesome news. I thought it was on a fast track for passage when it came out of the house with little dissent. Hat tip to Katie Kumari who picked up the little story and first reported on it. Another big tip of the hat goes to Nicole Young from the Tennessean who did a big story on it and got it out to a large and not to happy public. You people all came on strong and made your voice heard with letters, e mails and calls.
From there it was DOA.
Pat yourself on the back. Job well done!
"Obama Republicans"
A few members came up to me in quite a heated state tonight after session. Seems they were upset at the term "Obama Republicans". I used the term to describe some of the members who I thought would help pass the budget. They thought I was referring to them. Let me be clear. To date, no one fits that description. No one has voted for or against the budget so no one could fit it.
How would I define an "Obama Republicans"? I was talking about one aspect of the Obama philosophy. His taxing and deficit spending habits. If the legislators who came up to me feel their voting habits match those of Obamas then so be it. I said no names. Only their own conscience can make them feel deserving or not of the title.
How would I define an "Obama Republicans"? I was talking about one aspect of the Obama philosophy. His taxing and deficit spending habits. If the legislators who came up to me feel their voting habits match those of Obamas then so be it. I said no names. Only their own conscience can make them feel deserving or not of the title.
De-funding of planned parenthood to come up today
It made it through calendar on a voice vote. It passed finance on a party line vote. It should hit the floor this evening.
Monday, June 15, 2009
Obama Republicans to help pass budget
It is looking like the budget is going to come before us in the morning with all the senate cuts removed. Not only are the cuts removed and the governors spending added back on but Kent Williams added more spending back on the budget on top of the governors spending. How is it possible with such huge deficits you may ask? We are going into debt and spend on projects like we never have before. If passed we will be spending our budget for bridge construction for the next 12 years this coming year. That means if a bridge goes bad in year 7 or 8, or when ever, there will be no money to fix it. It will all be spent next year or be used to pay interest on the loans. We are also robbing the rainy day fund for more money. Tons of debt will be added to the people of the state.
Credit card logic.
Our comptroller and treasurer warned us repeatedly this is dangerous waters. We are spending huge betting on a comeback that will need to happen almost immediately. They do not see a quick turnaround in their projections.
New housing, light truck sales and home furnishings are where we get a huge chunk of our revenue. All three look sketchy for the immediate future. Most people see Tennessee as over built now, especially in high end homes. No new homes means no new furniture and with people questioning their employment new furniture for an old home will not likely be a top priority either. The auto industry...Well do you think many people feel confident enough to buy a new car or truck?
In two years when the stimulus money is gone, forget it, we fall off a cliff. People who were around a few years ago liken this to the lead up to the income tax wars.
It is looking like the Dems will all vote for the big spending budget in the house. Expect Kent Williams and his Obama Republicans to follow suit to pass it out of the house. The two versions (House and senate) will go to conference committee to hash out some compromise.
Credit card logic.
Our comptroller and treasurer warned us repeatedly this is dangerous waters. We are spending huge betting on a comeback that will need to happen almost immediately. They do not see a quick turnaround in their projections.
New housing, light truck sales and home furnishings are where we get a huge chunk of our revenue. All three look sketchy for the immediate future. Most people see Tennessee as over built now, especially in high end homes. No new homes means no new furniture and with people questioning their employment new furniture for an old home will not likely be a top priority either. The auto industry...Well do you think many people feel confident enough to buy a new car or truck?
In two years when the stimulus money is gone, forget it, we fall off a cliff. People who were around a few years ago liken this to the lead up to the income tax wars.
It is looking like the Dems will all vote for the big spending budget in the house. Expect Kent Williams and his Obama Republicans to follow suit to pass it out of the house. The two versions (House and senate) will go to conference committee to hash out some compromise.
Dems fight integration
The number two of the Democrat party speaks his mind against integration of public schools. I bet the old "Separate but equal" water fountains come back in style if Democrats take back over.
This cold get out of control
The terror (Or terrier) that is the "vicious dogs in bars" bill is starting to sink in on people. This could turn into the wild west for dogs. I can see it all now. Some Michael Vick wanabe brings his vicious dog to a bar and starts drinking. One dog bumps another dog next thing you know its a blood bath. Little babies could have their face ripped off for being at the wrong place at the wrong time. Where is the KNS editorial staff! Save us! Save us! Save us from the madness!
Sunday, June 14, 2009
Where its at
Here is a good rundown by the Times free press of the budget and where it is at this time.
Saturday, June 13, 2009
More urges then a high school kid on prom night
Tom give the lowdown on some of the top urges legislators feel others need to know about. I think all some legislators do is urge. When a bill is a dog but no one has the courage or heart to kill it as it deserves they amened it to urge one department or another.
Next year I think I will resolve to urge legislators to think about charging a fee against a legislators mail account for all urges and resolutions that come to the house floor for a vote. They say they may cost the state $800.00 each. Instead of urging I may actually go one better and try to put some teeth in it and pass it as a bill.
If it gets put back to an urge I will probably kill it myself.
Next year I think I will resolve to urge legislators to think about charging a fee against a legislators mail account for all urges and resolutions that come to the house floor for a vote. They say they may cost the state $800.00 each. Instead of urging I may actually go one better and try to put some teeth in it and pass it as a bill.
If it gets put back to an urge I will probably kill it myself.
It ain't just efficiency
Part of the governors "Technical corrections" bill has the state taking over some tax collections currently being done by the counties. It is being sold as a way for the state to more effectively and efficiently collect taxes on business.
Here is an example of how it has been sold from the Tom Humphreys article
"A provision authorizing the state to take over collection of gross-receipts business taxes, now collected by county clerks. The Department of Revenue estimates that increased efficiency and better enforcement will mean $21 million more revenue for the state and $25 million more for local governments statewide."
Wow! those numbers are huge!
Although some counties are not in favor of giving up the local control many of them have been placated with the promise of a greater return of money. It sounds all well and good. Greater efficiency is what we all say we want. If we can collect taxes we are already owed, cut the size of government bureaucracy its a winner right? We must really be doing some cutting right?
What few people realize is the increased revenue is not really all from efficiently collecting the money. It is from increasing the amount of money to be collected. Yes. A tax increase on businesses is also in there. One of our members found out that businesses will no longer be able to deduct some major property assets from their gross receipts business taxes.
Funny how that part never makes the press release.
Here is an example of how it has been sold from the Tom Humphreys article
"A provision authorizing the state to take over collection of gross-receipts business taxes, now collected by county clerks. The Department of Revenue estimates that increased efficiency and better enforcement will mean $21 million more revenue for the state and $25 million more for local governments statewide."
Wow! those numbers are huge!
Although some counties are not in favor of giving up the local control many of them have been placated with the promise of a greater return of money. It sounds all well and good. Greater efficiency is what we all say we want. If we can collect taxes we are already owed, cut the size of government bureaucracy its a winner right? We must really be doing some cutting right?
What few people realize is the increased revenue is not really all from efficiently collecting the money. It is from increasing the amount of money to be collected. Yes. A tax increase on businesses is also in there. One of our members found out that businesses will no longer be able to deduct some major property assets from their gross receipts business taxes.
Funny how that part never makes the press release.
Friday, June 12, 2009
Will Dems be Bredasunk?
Michael S. Dukakis LIFE photo
Does anyone remember this presidential candidate and his Dukackamamie ideas of letting prisoners out on furlow? I think it lead to the an add entitled the Willie Horton add. It was quite famous and was said to finish off this looser campaign.
Word is Phil Bredesen has a similar plan to release some prisoners early in an effort to save money on the budget. He needs every penny to build another empty mega site.
Could this lead to the Tennessee wave of Willie Horton adds? We will see. Bredesen use to be the lone hero of the party. The name they all linked to as "Conservative Democrats" to win races. Now coming out against gun bills left and right. Against states rights, for deficit spending and willing to release prisoners back to the streets early he could be pulling his party down like an anchor.
Governor thinks Rep. Fincher is stupid
I guess the governor does not think much about the legal abilities of one of his own parties lawyers. I am not sure how Phil's years studying the constitution somehow missed the 2nd, 9th and 10th amendment.
Thursday, June 11, 2009
Deal is being cut
The gun bill in parks is coming back from the gov (previous to veto) withdrawn by the sponsor. The local parks part part is coming out. The preemption of locals for guns in restaurants is going on.
Quote of the day
On the budget "Spending is the path of least resistance."
Name of the Democrat speaking withheld upon request.
Name of the Democrat speaking withheld upon request.
Dogs in bars?
We are arguing about dogs being allowed in bars and restaurants on the patios.
It is dog eat dog. My question is can the dog carry or smoke? If the dog is under 21 can he go in smoking restaurants and is that age counted in dog years or people years?
It is dog eat dog. My question is can the dog carry or smoke? If the dog is under 21 can he go in smoking restaurants and is that age counted in dog years or people years?
The new party of no
Tennessee Democrats have turned into the party of no. No limits on spending, No cuts for an un balanced budget, no alternative plan, no ideas to help business get out from under the burden of regulation, no plan to lower taxes on struggling small businesses.
They yell and scream like the Incredible Hulk about Republican plans but when it comes time to offer their own plan to balance the budget they turn into Brian Boitano.
They yell and scream like the Incredible Hulk about Republican plans but when it comes time to offer their own plan to balance the budget they turn into Brian Boitano.
Off to Taiwan
Rumors are floating that the governor is talking about shutting down the legislature for a few weeks if we don't finish next week. Seems a junket to Taiwan is coming up.
Gov Veto's guns in parks
Conflicting stories are swirling around that late last night Phil vetoed or was about to veto the guns in parks bill.
Wednesday, June 10, 2009
Gun fights
The house and senate are positioning on what they want to do about the guns in restaurant that serve legislation. Some say we need to add in a preemption clause to stop local communities from saying local governments can not forbid restaurants that may allow legal gun owners in restaurants that serve. Some communities are saying they are going to hold off on doing it until the legislature is out of session so we can not act if they do it. The question is how, when and if can it be done.
The rumor is a preemption can be done on another bill but the only way the governor will not veto will be if it goes on the guns in parks bill. Of course he wants something to come off. The come off is the local parks provision of the guns in parks provision, that, or he wants the opt out turned into an opt in.
The session rolls on and days are winding down. If he were going to veto he needs to do it after we leave. He knows he does not have the votes to keep anything from an override. If it goes on the parks bill and he gets what he wants, no problem. No veto. Any other bill and we may be gone when it comes time for the governors signature (and potential veto). We could put it on the parks bill as it is and see if he has the will to veto the guns in parks bill. Word is he will. He may not want to go down that road again on the more popular bill. Either way we may still be here to override. We may not.
If we do put it on another bill the governor may be in Europe and may not be able to veto anyway.
The dealing is still going on.
The rumor is a preemption can be done on another bill but the only way the governor will not veto will be if it goes on the guns in parks bill. Of course he wants something to come off. The come off is the local parks provision of the guns in parks provision, that, or he wants the opt out turned into an opt in.
The session rolls on and days are winding down. If he were going to veto he needs to do it after we leave. He knows he does not have the votes to keep anything from an override. If it goes on the parks bill and he gets what he wants, no problem. No veto. Any other bill and we may be gone when it comes time for the governors signature (and potential veto). We could put it on the parks bill as it is and see if he has the will to veto the guns in parks bill. Word is he will. He may not want to go down that road again on the more popular bill. Either way we may still be here to override. We may not.
If we do put it on another bill the governor may be in Europe and may not be able to veto anyway.
The dealing is still going on.
Con con
Word on the hill is a constitutional convention could be coming on the judicial selection process.
Quote of the day
"The difference between us is, I am nuts about guns. You guys are f@#$in nuts about guns."*
*Name of legislator speaking and spoken to withheld upon request.
*Name of legislator speaking and spoken to withheld upon request.
"Put it on the card"
It is looking more and more like the Democrat plan is to INCREASE spending and put all the cost on a "credit card" of bond debt. I guess they think those bills never come due.
Tuesday, June 09, 2009
"I am from the government and I am here to help you"
George Korda has a really great article on personal rights, freedoms and responsibilities. He is dead on. I see a giant creep of government all over our personal rights and freedoms and it about always starts as a safety campaign.
Those that don't start with safety are mandating energy efficiency. Never cost efficiency for the consumer. These unfunded government mandates while well intended are not in the proper role of government. People should be allowed to buy safe products that fit their needs as they see fit. If a product will cost the owner more in the long run it will be taken into account and weighed against the immediate cost increase on the front end. The choice should be the consumers. Not governments.
Many times these rules regulate small mom and pop producers out of business. They increase the cost of production for the remaining producers, who later, push up purchase price of new products. All the new regulation of course requires more government to ensure the new rule, regulations and standards are met. Who picks up the tab for them? You and me.
Reagan was right when he said the most feared words an individual can hear are "I am from the government and I am hear to help you". We are already about helped to death. Please don't help us any more.
Those that don't start with safety are mandating energy efficiency. Never cost efficiency for the consumer. These unfunded government mandates while well intended are not in the proper role of government. People should be allowed to buy safe products that fit their needs as they see fit. If a product will cost the owner more in the long run it will be taken into account and weighed against the immediate cost increase on the front end. The choice should be the consumers. Not governments.
Many times these rules regulate small mom and pop producers out of business. They increase the cost of production for the remaining producers, who later, push up purchase price of new products. All the new regulation of course requires more government to ensure the new rule, regulations and standards are met. Who picks up the tab for them? You and me.
Reagan was right when he said the most feared words an individual can hear are "I am from the government and I am hear to help you". We are already about helped to death. Please don't help us any more.
Not any time soon
It is doubtful we will get out this week. Next week isn't looking much better.
The senate is doubtful on presenting a budget this week and if they do they don't think it will make it to the floor right away. Several people are seeing more and more problems with the technical corrections bill as well. Some people feel they were lied to by the governors staff in their description of the technical corrections bill. Things that were supposedly just going to allow the state to collect money for the locals (in a more efficient way) is actually going to increase taxes on small businesses. The income tax on some sports athletes is now going to to Memphis government.
The Dems are all over the place. No alternative plan except blame the plan for cuts and argue about the cuts the governor is making. No one likes the cuts but it is a starting point.
We are ready to hear the Democrat plan to substitute the cuts from mental health and other areas and replace it with cuts from somewhere new. So far it has been a lot of "We don't like this or that" cries but no plan of action to fix it.
Well ladies, its time to put on your big boy pants and step up to the plate with alternative cuts if you don't like something. The Republicans have brought some ideas forward. The other side is not stepping up. We are open to alternative cut plans but the plans we have beats no plan at all every time.
The senate is doubtful on presenting a budget this week and if they do they don't think it will make it to the floor right away. Several people are seeing more and more problems with the technical corrections bill as well. Some people feel they were lied to by the governors staff in their description of the technical corrections bill. Things that were supposedly just going to allow the state to collect money for the locals (in a more efficient way) is actually going to increase taxes on small businesses. The income tax on some sports athletes is now going to to Memphis government.
The Dems are all over the place. No alternative plan except blame the plan for cuts and argue about the cuts the governor is making. No one likes the cuts but it is a starting point.
We are ready to hear the Democrat plan to substitute the cuts from mental health and other areas and replace it with cuts from somewhere new. So far it has been a lot of "We don't like this or that" cries but no plan of action to fix it.
Well ladies, its time to put on your big boy pants and step up to the plate with alternative cuts if you don't like something. The Republicans have brought some ideas forward. The other side is not stepping up. We are open to alternative cut plans but the plans we have beats no plan at all every time.
Monday, June 08, 2009
Holdin back. Yea, I got control
I was speaking to a friend of mine in the senate and he mentioned something that a lot of us in the house are thinking. That the governor is holding back on some of the stimulus money. That we are going to pass a tough budget and then he is going to find some money to hire some people back or do some other project. This makes him look like a hero after we have taken the heat for doing the hard work. It could also allow him to shift around some money to some special pet projects after we are out for the year.
If only we had the committee system
The time is running down on charter schools legislation. The bill was killed in the education committee when the Dems locked down and voted unit rule. No one had majority so it died. Now we are looking to loose 100 million in federal stimulus money if we don't pass it. 50 million a year. In the caucus meeting Kent Williams got up and said how he was a huge supporter of charter schools and how important it is that we stick together and pass this bill as an amendment to another bill. We needed caucus unity. We needed to lock down. How this bill is important to him so the caucus had to be unified to get it passed. He went on and on.
Many of us were just shaking our heads. We know this bill would never have been stopped in the first place had the committee been Republican controlled. It would have sailed through. Yes, that bill is important, but so were 100 other dead bills to many Republicans. Not just to him.
Some people have thought how it would be appropriate if the bill were not able to get on as an amendment. The constant argument has been if it didn't make it through the bipartisan committee system on its own it should not come on as an amendment. It should have bipartisan support. Now when it is important to him bipartisanship is out the window.
If someone doesn't like the makeup of the committee system they should blame the person who set it up.
Many of us were just shaking our heads. We know this bill would never have been stopped in the first place had the committee been Republican controlled. It would have sailed through. Yes, that bill is important, but so were 100 other dead bills to many Republicans. Not just to him.
Some people have thought how it would be appropriate if the bill were not able to get on as an amendment. The constant argument has been if it didn't make it through the bipartisan committee system on its own it should not come on as an amendment. It should have bipartisan support. Now when it is important to him bipartisanship is out the window.
If someone doesn't like the makeup of the committee system they should blame the person who set it up.
Budget, technical corrections, etc.
The picture is starting to look more clear as to what we are going to be looking at the next few days. The gov has put forward his budget/technical corrections (Tax increase) bill and we are starting to put together our alternate plan. New numbers are looking more and more grim every month so some of the cuts need to be deeper than were originally planned. Some of the things we are looking at changing are....
Getting rid of all the road bonding that would more or less spend all our future road money at one time instead of over the next 12 years. We would save about 14 million a year in interest alone on the bonds.
We are also looking at not bonding our debt for some projects ($168 million savings). Phil wanted to save our cash and use bonds for some projects. We were of the mind if the money is not there don't spend it.
We want to get rid of the new tax on phone and cable boxes.
Adjusting the FONCE to not include up to 4 plex houses. The savings on this is questionable. The FONCE tax can quite easily be avoided even if it is implemented by changing your corporate status but Phil's people want it to go into effect any way.
The layoffs would go on as the governor planned.
A chunk of money ($ 22 million)for pre K that was being funded by general budget is now going to be funded by the lottery reserves. Most people thought that Pre K had not shown results according to the governors own study and was supposed to be funded by the lottery in the first place.
Another caucus vote was taken to make Pre K be totally funded by lottery proceeds or surplus and the vote was all but unanimous for that position (savings $52 million).
About all projects not already underway or absolutely necessary were going to be cut from the budget. Forget the solar projects. The VW project is still being funded.
We all were ready to make the cuts necessary and even a bunch more ideas came up for smaller numbers. When we asked where the Dems were on the idea of the cuts already purposed the response was just the opposite of our caucus. They were all arguing about how they could spend MORE money. They want to rob the reserves, rainy day funds and increase taxes to prop it all up for two more years!
Rep. Tony Shipley got up and brought up some good points. He said how the governors original plan was to have across the board cuts of 14%. After the "Stimulus" the cuts would only be 3%.
If we don't start making cuts now, when 2011 hits and the stimulus money runs out we will be looking at a 11% drop in funds minimum. That is if the budget stays where it is. No one, and I mean NO ONE, is expecting things to be as good next year as they are this year.
If we don't start to cut now and instead prop it up with reserves, in two years it is not going to be pretty. Huge cuts and little to no reserves to soften the blow. No soft glide down. Just a jump off a cliff.
The Dem leaders have been saying they need 30 Republican votes to pass the governors budget with all the cuts. They weren't going to do all the heavy lifting and dirty work. Since that time the picture has gotten worse. I have heard one Democrat leader tell his supporters how his new plan was to run the state into a ditch and blame Republicans for it. Republicans are stepping up to the plate and doing the hard work for a reasonable budget. Where are the Democrat plans?
Getting rid of all the road bonding that would more or less spend all our future road money at one time instead of over the next 12 years. We would save about 14 million a year in interest alone on the bonds.
We are also looking at not bonding our debt for some projects ($168 million savings). Phil wanted to save our cash and use bonds for some projects. We were of the mind if the money is not there don't spend it.
We want to get rid of the new tax on phone and cable boxes.
Adjusting the FONCE to not include up to 4 plex houses. The savings on this is questionable. The FONCE tax can quite easily be avoided even if it is implemented by changing your corporate status but Phil's people want it to go into effect any way.
The layoffs would go on as the governor planned.
A chunk of money ($ 22 million)for pre K that was being funded by general budget is now going to be funded by the lottery reserves. Most people thought that Pre K had not shown results according to the governors own study and was supposed to be funded by the lottery in the first place.
Another caucus vote was taken to make Pre K be totally funded by lottery proceeds or surplus and the vote was all but unanimous for that position (savings $52 million).
About all projects not already underway or absolutely necessary were going to be cut from the budget. Forget the solar projects. The VW project is still being funded.
We all were ready to make the cuts necessary and even a bunch more ideas came up for smaller numbers. When we asked where the Dems were on the idea of the cuts already purposed the response was just the opposite of our caucus. They were all arguing about how they could spend MORE money. They want to rob the reserves, rainy day funds and increase taxes to prop it all up for two more years!
Rep. Tony Shipley got up and brought up some good points. He said how the governors original plan was to have across the board cuts of 14%. After the "Stimulus" the cuts would only be 3%.
If we don't start making cuts now, when 2011 hits and the stimulus money runs out we will be looking at a 11% drop in funds minimum. That is if the budget stays where it is. No one, and I mean NO ONE, is expecting things to be as good next year as they are this year.
If we don't start to cut now and instead prop it up with reserves, in two years it is not going to be pretty. Huge cuts and little to no reserves to soften the blow. No soft glide down. Just a jump off a cliff.
The Dem leaders have been saying they need 30 Republican votes to pass the governors budget with all the cuts. They weren't going to do all the heavy lifting and dirty work. Since that time the picture has gotten worse. I have heard one Democrat leader tell his supporters how his new plan was to run the state into a ditch and blame Republicans for it. Republicans are stepping up to the plate and doing the hard work for a reasonable budget. Where are the Democrat plans?
Saturday, June 06, 2009
And its not even my birthday!
I am starting to feel the love.
Its not even my birthday and already I am starting to receive gifts. Just today I received an nice offer from the ACLU to work on board a beautiful Cruise ship as a "sighter" (Not quite sure what that is yet) The kind people at the TN Democrat Party have also sent me my new uniform!
Wow! why all the sudden love?
Its not even my birthday and already I am starting to receive gifts. Just today I received an nice offer from the ACLU to work on board a beautiful Cruise ship as a "sighter" (Not quite sure what that is yet) The kind people at the TN Democrat Party have also sent me my new uniform!
Wow! why all the sudden love?
Friday, June 05, 2009
Comment of the day
I was on the "Lets Talk Frank" Radio show today and we were talking about the guns in restaurants that serve legislation. Most were for the legislation and one caller (Lennis?) made a great point. He said....
Imagine you go into Wal-Mart with your kid. You and your kid are walking down the isle and another kid in front of you starts to go crazy and rip thing off the shelves, make a mess and such. What do you do? Do you start to spank your own kid for what the other kid is doing? No! He didn't do it. He had nothing to do with it.
But that is what gun control people want to do. Punish good legal gun owner for what a very small percent of bad illegal gun owners might do. It does not work.
Imagine you go into Wal-Mart with your kid. You and your kid are walking down the isle and another kid in front of you starts to go crazy and rip thing off the shelves, make a mess and such. What do you do? Do you start to spank your own kid for what the other kid is doing? No! He didn't do it. He had nothing to do with it.
But that is what gun control people want to do. Punish good legal gun owner for what a very small percent of bad illegal gun owners might do. It does not work.
Anti american sign?
'WE WOULD RATHER
DO BUSINESS WITH
1,000 AL QAEDA TERRORISTS
THAN WITH ONE SINGLE AMERICAN SOLDIER!'
This sign was prominently displayed in the window of a business in the good old USA. You are probably outraged at the thought of such an inflammatory statement. However, we are a society which holds Freedom of Speech as perhaps our greatest liberty.
And after all, it is just a sign.
You may ask what kind of business would dare post such a sign.
The answer is in the comments section.
DO BUSINESS WITH
1,000 AL QAEDA TERRORISTS
THAN WITH ONE SINGLE AMERICAN SOLDIER!'
This sign was prominently displayed in the window of a business in the good old USA. You are probably outraged at the thought of such an inflammatory statement. However, we are a society which holds Freedom of Speech as perhaps our greatest liberty.
And after all, it is just a sign.
You may ask what kind of business would dare post such a sign.
The answer is in the comments section.
Graduated income tax part of budget
A graduated income tax on some athletes is a planned part of the new budget. The $2,500.00 tax goes on some professional athletes and entertainers that make over $50K a year, but not others. Effected are the NBA Grizzlies and the NHL Predators competition. Exempt are about everyone else. I do not support this camels nose under the tent but I find it interesting that the one pro team that Bredesen gave the farm to to get them to come to Tennessee (The Titans) get a complete pass.
The budget amendment is being called a "Privilege fee" on out of state athletes and entertainers. But is income based. If your profession is in sports and or entertainment then you should be covered equally regardless of income or state of origin if it were a fee.
Bredesen has tried to slip this in with many other unpopular bills that he can not pass through the committee process on their own but he wants just the same. He has bundled this tax in with a half dozen or so tax increases in the "Technical corrections" bill.
Thursday, June 04, 2009
Bustin the cap
We have just been informed the state will STILL bust the Copeland spending cap by $248,500,000.00.
This is not happening in Tennessee
I don't know how much more proof is needed after this article. I think it says it all. Knox county removing the filters to gay, lesbian, transgendered websites at area schools.
I am sure the third graders are thrilled.
Is this the job of our schools or our families?
I am sure the third graders are thrilled.
Is this the job of our schools or our families?
Wednesday, June 03, 2009
I'm Sorry
After today this is just too funny not to post. This is how I think many people believe the legislation we passed will make things in Tennessee.
Interesting comments
Rep Bill Dunn made some interesting comments on the house floor and after session when talking about the guns in restaurants that serve alcohol legislation. His point was..
All this yelling and screaming about "guns in bars" or "Guns and alcohol don't mix" It is funny how many of these legislators only seem to care about one side of the equation. The gun side. It is not the gun that makes people have bad judgement. It is the alcohol. Yet these same people voted just today to put alcohol in dry counties against the wishes of the county, remove some restrictions on sale of liquor and make it so bars only have to be open 3 days a week. If they were really serious about limiting death they would say no driving to a bar or place that serves alcohol. More people will drink, drive and end up killing someone then will ever break the law by drinking and then shooting a place up.
No one ever says we should remove the parking lots at places that sell alcohol.
All this yelling and screaming about "guns in bars" or "Guns and alcohol don't mix" It is funny how many of these legislators only seem to care about one side of the equation. The gun side. It is not the gun that makes people have bad judgement. It is the alcohol. Yet these same people voted just today to put alcohol in dry counties against the wishes of the county, remove some restrictions on sale of liquor and make it so bars only have to be open 3 days a week. If they were really serious about limiting death they would say no driving to a bar or place that serves alcohol. More people will drink, drive and end up killing someone then will ever break the law by drinking and then shooting a place up.
No one ever says we should remove the parking lots at places that sell alcohol.
Questions to the AG
If you liked the bill I first ran two years ago then you might also like the questions I just sent to the attorney general.
Please respond to the following questions with your opinion
With the 9th and 10th amendment, by what right is the federal government entitled to taxes on products that are made/grown/manufactured in Tennessee as well as bought, sold and used or consumed in the state Tennessee for Tennesseans exclusively? Are those taxes, laws and regulations uniform for all such Tennessee products.
Are products made, sold and used exclusively in Tennessee for Tennesseans intrastate commerce items? Could the Tennessee state manufacturers be eligible to stop paying federal tax and or following federal regulations on items that are made, bought, sold and used exclusively in Tennessee?
If those Tennessee made products could be limited to in state sales, use or consumption could the manufacturers be only limited to restrictions imposed by state government?
Are said Tennessee products that are sold both in state and out of state federally mandated to pay taxes on and follow the federal laws for all of their products or can they pay / follow the laws on a proportional scale based on the numbers sold in state and used exclusively in state vs. Products manufactured in state but for out of state use or consumption.
If the federal taxes collected or the regulation on these Tennessee made, sold and used products, was collected, implemented or enforced improperly, could the manufacturers sue the federal government for improper taxation or regulation?
Could the state impose taxation and regulations at the state level for those Tennessee grown, made, sold, used or consumed products to mirror closely the current federal taxes and laws?
.
Thank you ,
Rep. Stacey Campfield
Please respond to the following questions with your opinion
With the 9th and 10th amendment, by what right is the federal government entitled to taxes on products that are made/grown/manufactured in Tennessee as well as bought, sold and used or consumed in the state Tennessee for Tennesseans exclusively? Are those taxes, laws and regulations uniform for all such Tennessee products.
Are products made, sold and used exclusively in Tennessee for Tennesseans intrastate commerce items? Could the Tennessee state manufacturers be eligible to stop paying federal tax and or following federal regulations on items that are made, bought, sold and used exclusively in Tennessee?
If those Tennessee made products could be limited to in state sales, use or consumption could the manufacturers be only limited to restrictions imposed by state government?
Are said Tennessee products that are sold both in state and out of state federally mandated to pay taxes on and follow the federal laws for all of their products or can they pay / follow the laws on a proportional scale based on the numbers sold in state and used exclusively in state vs. Products manufactured in state but for out of state use or consumption.
If the federal taxes collected or the regulation on these Tennessee made, sold and used products, was collected, implemented or enforced improperly, could the manufacturers sue the federal government for improper taxation or regulation?
Could the state impose taxation and regulations at the state level for those Tennessee grown, made, sold, used or consumed products to mirror closely the current federal taxes and laws?
.
Thank you ,
Rep. Stacey Campfield
Feel the power of the governor!
After the governors dog and pony show veto he lost 3 more votes then he had against the bill the first time and one member who voted for the bill last time was absent.
Veto Finito
The house has overridden the governors veto on the guns in restaurant bill HB962 by Curry Todd. 69 to override 27 to uphold. As legislators talked against the bill the legislative caucus members who are or were former police officers stood behind Curry in support of the right to carry.
Do guns and alcohol really mix?
Today HB898 by Watson allowed police officers and former police officers to carry in places that serve alcohol when off duty. Police officers don't necessarily have a carry permit. They often times have POST certification. We will see if Bredesen really believes "Guns and alcohol don't mix" if he vetos the bill to be consistant. I am ready for chief Serpas to come out strongly against this legislation if he really believes what he says.
Another 100 million shy
Word is the budget will be an additional 100 million shy when the numbers for last month come out. Most of it is credited to a lack of new car sales. With the flux going on with most car companies who can blame the public for holding out?
Tuesday, June 02, 2009
Question all you want
I am backed up by the facts.
A lot of hub bub going on over a post I did late last night after a caucus dinner about the police photo with the gov signing the veto. In the post I said...
We are now finding out they were all in town for some convention or other and were asked to come over and meet the governor during a break.
Of course most of them went. When they got there they were all piled in together and finally told what it was about just shortly before the signing of his veto with them as the backdrop.
They did not come to the event knowing they were about to be used.
This info came from Curry Todd the bills sponsor who was talking about it publicly last night at the dinner.
Tom Humphreys digs in and backs up what I reported on hearing. From the Humphreys article...
Todd added, however, that he did understand "some of them attending over there didn't know what the meeting was about."
The Tennessee Association of Chiefs of Police was having a scheduled meeting in Nashville on Friday, according to Knoxville Police Chief Sterling Owen IV, current president of the organization......
........Lydia Lenker, spokeswoman for Bredesen, said the meeting was "great timing for us"
Clearly they were not there just for the governors signing. They were there for a scheduled meeting. They didn't just happen to wonder over to the signing. By Lenkers tone they were invited by the governor or his people. By Currys report some did not know what the meeting was about.
I don't deny some may support his veto, I never did. But if any came in not knowing what it was about they were used. I guess the only way to know who was for or against would be to ask all the officers who were present. I think there are people looking for a list of those present if anyone wants to volunteer names.
A lot of hub bub going on over a post I did late last night after a caucus dinner about the police photo with the gov signing the veto. In the post I said...
We are now finding out they were all in town for some convention or other and were asked to come over and meet the governor during a break.
Of course most of them went. When they got there they were all piled in together and finally told what it was about just shortly before the signing of his veto with them as the backdrop.
They did not come to the event knowing they were about to be used.
This info came from Curry Todd the bills sponsor who was talking about it publicly last night at the dinner.
Tom Humphreys digs in and backs up what I reported on hearing. From the Humphreys article...
Todd added, however, that he did understand "some of them attending over there didn't know what the meeting was about."
The Tennessee Association of Chiefs of Police was having a scheduled meeting in Nashville on Friday, according to Knoxville Police Chief Sterling Owen IV, current president of the organization......
........Lydia Lenker, spokeswoman for Bredesen, said the meeting was "great timing for us"
Clearly they were not there just for the governors signing. They were there for a scheduled meeting. They didn't just happen to wonder over to the signing. By Lenkers tone they were invited by the governor or his people. By Currys report some did not know what the meeting was about.
I don't deny some may support his veto, I never did. But if any came in not knowing what it was about they were used. I guess the only way to know who was for or against would be to ask all the officers who were present. I think there are people looking for a list of those present if anyone wants to volunteer names.
Take all the money! Except the 100 million.
The Dems love to yell and scream how we need more money for education all the time. How this tax increase and that tax increase are all for education when only a small percent really goes for education.
They also love to say we need to take every single penny of the stimulus money we can get. "If we don't take it someone else will" and "We would have to be fools to turn down free money even if their are some reasonable strings"
But when the state has an opportunity to collect $100,000,000.00 of stimulus money for education they turn it down flat under lock down unit rule of their caucus.
The string? They would have to allow more state run charter schools to take over failing schools.
Charter schools are a designated state run schools that are not restricted to the same rules and regulations on a lot of issues. Issues like teacher tenure protection for bad teachers. In many places they have been shown to get greatly improved testing results for the students.
It was killed in the neutral education committee where no one has any control to push anything through.
Not only do we loose the $100,000,000.00 in stimulus money but it will probably end up costing us more when we have to close some perpetually failing schools under No Child Left Behind.
The teachers unions have the Dems in a death grip and wont let go. Even when it gets more money for education and its for the kids.
Where are we ranked in education again?
They also love to say we need to take every single penny of the stimulus money we can get. "If we don't take it someone else will" and "We would have to be fools to turn down free money even if their are some reasonable strings"
But when the state has an opportunity to collect $100,000,000.00 of stimulus money for education they turn it down flat under lock down unit rule of their caucus.
The string? They would have to allow more state run charter schools to take over failing schools.
Charter schools are a designated state run schools that are not restricted to the same rules and regulations on a lot of issues. Issues like teacher tenure protection for bad teachers. In many places they have been shown to get greatly improved testing results for the students.
It was killed in the neutral education committee where no one has any control to push anything through.
Not only do we loose the $100,000,000.00 in stimulus money but it will probably end up costing us more when we have to close some perpetually failing schools under No Child Left Behind.
The teachers unions have the Dems in a death grip and wont let go. Even when it gets more money for education and its for the kids.
Where are we ranked in education again?
Monday, June 01, 2009
On those Police chiefs
It is now coming out that several of those police chefs may not have been as excited about the governors over ride on the gun bill as he would like people to believe.
We are now finding out they were all in town for some convention or other and were asked to come over and meet the governor during a break. Of course most of them went. When they got there they were all piled in together and finally told what it was about just shortly before the signing of his veto with them as the backdrop.
They did not come to the event knowing they were about to be used.
Sneaky
We are now finding out they were all in town for some convention or other and were asked to come over and meet the governor during a break. Of course most of them went. When they got there they were all piled in together and finally told what it was about just shortly before the signing of his veto with them as the backdrop.
They did not come to the event knowing they were about to be used.
Sneaky
Show me the money!!!
Tonight the caucus got together and started to talk brass tacks on the budget. So far it is looking like we are going to be able to cut a lot of what the governor wants to spend on and keep from having to increase taxes as much.
The bond package is looking dead. That will save tens of millions in debt and interest. we will remove the tax increase implementation on cable boxes. The fonce tax increase is looking to be cut if not eliminated. It is already down to out of state owners and properties larger then quadplexes. The money the gov wanted to spend on pre K from the general fund will now be coming out of lottery reserve funds instead.
We started to brainstorm on other ideas to save the state money.
In no order some of my favorites are...
1. Sell, lease or close all the state golf courses that are not making money. $2.3 million. I hear one is planning a major renovation that will put it deeper in the red.
2. Stop construction on the party bunker until more money comes it. Some people suggested to just fill it in with dirt. Cant say I really against the idea much.
3. Cut funding for the arts and non profits and planned parenthood. About $8 million there. I like the arts but if it quality it will be able to stand on its own.
4. Cut funding for the study of earthquakes. that is over a million dollars in state money alone a year. They have been studying them for going on 30 years. I think we know enough for now.
5. Freeze all non emergency travel.
6. Opt out of the federal highway gas tax. It is optional and if we opt out and keep the gas tax at its current level the state will have more money then what it gets from the fed.
7. This one I must say is about my favorite. Just off the 10th amendment resolution several of us have been talking about how we give money to the fed we don't need to give them. They are only entitled to money from products made in Tennessee but sold outside of Tennessee.
We currently also give the fed money on some things even if it is made and sold inside Tennessee. Many of us think because of the 9th and 10 amendment they aren't entitled to it.
We are looking into the legality of saying a wide variety of items that the fed taxes should have the locally sold percent held back. Items such as alcohol (Can you say Jack Danial's, George Dickle, etc.) Tobacco and guns that are manufactured and sold in Tennessee are just a few of the items we came up with off the top of our heads. If they are made and sold in Tennessee then why are we giving the fed money for it?
If we were to keep part of the money for just the percent that is sold in Tennessee we could be talking millions upon millions. The fed may squawk but I want to see them argue against the constitution.
The bond package is looking dead. That will save tens of millions in debt and interest. we will remove the tax increase implementation on cable boxes. The fonce tax increase is looking to be cut if not eliminated. It is already down to out of state owners and properties larger then quadplexes. The money the gov wanted to spend on pre K from the general fund will now be coming out of lottery reserve funds instead.
We started to brainstorm on other ideas to save the state money.
In no order some of my favorites are...
1. Sell, lease or close all the state golf courses that are not making money. $2.3 million. I hear one is planning a major renovation that will put it deeper in the red.
2. Stop construction on the party bunker until more money comes it. Some people suggested to just fill it in with dirt. Cant say I really against the idea much.
3. Cut funding for the arts and non profits and planned parenthood. About $8 million there. I like the arts but if it quality it will be able to stand on its own.
4. Cut funding for the study of earthquakes. that is over a million dollars in state money alone a year. They have been studying them for going on 30 years. I think we know enough for now.
5. Freeze all non emergency travel.
6. Opt out of the federal highway gas tax. It is optional and if we opt out and keep the gas tax at its current level the state will have more money then what it gets from the fed.
7. This one I must say is about my favorite. Just off the 10th amendment resolution several of us have been talking about how we give money to the fed we don't need to give them. They are only entitled to money from products made in Tennessee but sold outside of Tennessee.
We currently also give the fed money on some things even if it is made and sold inside Tennessee. Many of us think because of the 9th and 10 amendment they aren't entitled to it.
We are looking into the legality of saying a wide variety of items that the fed taxes should have the locally sold percent held back. Items such as alcohol (Can you say Jack Danial's, George Dickle, etc.) Tobacco and guns that are manufactured and sold in Tennessee are just a few of the items we came up with off the top of our heads. If they are made and sold in Tennessee then why are we giving the fed money for it?
If we were to keep part of the money for just the percent that is sold in Tennessee we could be talking millions upon millions. The fed may squawk but I want to see them argue against the constitution.
The override starts
Curry Todd starts the override of the governors veto on HB962.
Curry Todd lets the governor know what he thinks. After hearing the governors plead, Curry Said "I wont tell the governor what he can do with that piece of paper!"
Curry Todd lets the governor know what he thinks. After hearing the governors plead, Curry Said "I wont tell the governor what he can do with that piece of paper!"
Sunday, May 31, 2009
AHHHH.. The caption bill
Tom Humphreys gives a great effort in trying to explain the confusing caption bill system.
Friday, May 29, 2009
Comments out
In an attempt to get the aggregator working again the comment section is back out. Hopefully it can be resolved quickly with both in place.
Dem leader caught in lie to NRA
I value a person who can be trusted with his word or oath. I hate to use the word liar. I really do. To me it is one of the greatest insults you can throw at a person if it is true. I know there can be different interpretations on an issue. There is an old police officer saying "No one lies like an eye witness" and I don't doubt that. But the NRA survey is about iron clad. When they ask questions they are quite detailed and specific. Not a lot that can be misconstrued.
That makes this Andy Sher story about the governor and his promise to the NRA even more disheartening.
The executive director of the NRA’s Institute for Legislative Action, Chris Cox, in a statement called the veto “a shock and a major disappointment to gun owners and supporters of the Second Amendment because Governor Bredesen had committed to supporting this legislation.”
“During the 2006 campaign, Governor Bredesen assured Tennesseans — and the NRA in writing — that he would support this effort. NRA’s endorsement of Governor Bredesen that year centered largely on this promise. Today, that trust has been betrayed,” Mr. Cox said.
That makes this Andy Sher story about the governor and his promise to the NRA even more disheartening.
The executive director of the NRA’s Institute for Legislative Action, Chris Cox, in a statement called the veto “a shock and a major disappointment to gun owners and supporters of the Second Amendment because Governor Bredesen had committed to supporting this legislation.”
“During the 2006 campaign, Governor Bredesen assured Tennesseans — and the NRA in writing — that he would support this effort. NRA’s endorsement of Governor Bredesen that year centered largely on this promise. Today, that trust has been betrayed,” Mr. Cox said.
Tennessee and the economy ahead
If you think this years budget is bad just wait till next year.
Years of party bunker building, starting and expanding a daycare/pre k program as well as tons of other un needed boondoggles and perks for administration have left the state in dire need of cuts. The governor is instead going after the mentally ill, the handicapped, increasing taxes and raiding the rainy day fund.
What "great" fiscal manager he is.
If you think this year is bad you ain't seen nothin yet. Next year will be worse. Way worse. This years revenue started off OK. Money flowed as was expected or at least pretty close to it.
Then, the bottom fell out. It was bad for a few months then it got worse. That, and the governors refusal to cut some programs so he could qualify to get federal money is going to put the state in a tail spin. We are pumping what financial "air" we have into a balloon with a hole in it.
Next year we wont even have the first few months of a semi good economy to base our revenue on. The year will start bad, and by all projections, end bad. Sorry, Obama cool aid drinkers. The "stimulus" is not going to pull us out as was promised. We will have eaten up a chunk of our rainy day fund (that kept our bond rating up and our interest rates low) and the tax increases will do what they often do do (Increase revenue for a short term and then go flat). If he passes his bond spending package this year we will have really mortgaged our future for road projects this year and next.
Next year I predict more of the same "spend it all" attitude from the Dali lama of Democrats. He will raid a bunch more of the rainy day fund, go after the reserves of many departments that many people don't know about, increase taxes, make some minor cuts and limp out of office looking halfway competent. Short of huge swing in the economy the year after will be an all out train wreck.
Of course Phil wont be there then. The party bunker will be a show place, We will still have the golf courses, all Phil's staff will still have had their raises and a probable Republican will be left to hold the empty bag. I guess we will always have that going for us.
Years of party bunker building, starting and expanding a daycare/pre k program as well as tons of other un needed boondoggles and perks for administration have left the state in dire need of cuts. The governor is instead going after the mentally ill, the handicapped, increasing taxes and raiding the rainy day fund.
What "great" fiscal manager he is.
If you think this year is bad you ain't seen nothin yet. Next year will be worse. Way worse. This years revenue started off OK. Money flowed as was expected or at least pretty close to it.
Then, the bottom fell out. It was bad for a few months then it got worse. That, and the governors refusal to cut some programs so he could qualify to get federal money is going to put the state in a tail spin. We are pumping what financial "air" we have into a balloon with a hole in it.
Next year we wont even have the first few months of a semi good economy to base our revenue on. The year will start bad, and by all projections, end bad. Sorry, Obama cool aid drinkers. The "stimulus" is not going to pull us out as was promised. We will have eaten up a chunk of our rainy day fund (that kept our bond rating up and our interest rates low) and the tax increases will do what they often do do (Increase revenue for a short term and then go flat). If he passes his bond spending package this year we will have really mortgaged our future for road projects this year and next.
Next year I predict more of the same "spend it all" attitude from the Dali lama of Democrats. He will raid a bunch more of the rainy day fund, go after the reserves of many departments that many people don't know about, increase taxes, make some minor cuts and limp out of office looking halfway competent. Short of huge swing in the economy the year after will be an all out train wreck.
Of course Phil wont be there then. The party bunker will be a show place, We will still have the golf courses, all Phil's staff will still have had their raises and a probable Republican will be left to hold the empty bag. I guess we will always have that going for us.
Is Phil for guns in high schools?
Governor Phil shot down legal gun owner rights but one line he made in his veto speech made me wonder. Phil said...
"As a young man growing up in a small town, I attended a gun safety class in my high school sponsored by the National Rifle Association."
He may be against guns in restaurants but by his own admission seems to have no problem with minors having guns at high schools. Interesting......
"As a young man growing up in a small town, I attended a gun safety class in my high school sponsored by the National Rifle Association."
He may be against guns in restaurants but by his own admission seems to have no problem with minors having guns at high schools. Interesting......
Thursday, May 28, 2009
Story shift
As many of you know and have heard by now the Gov has vetoed the bill to allow gun owners to carry in restaurants. As some of you know the veto power of the governor is minuscule in Tennessee. To say it is sure to be overridden is an understatement. When over 3/4 of the legislature voted for a bill it is almost unthinkable that it will suddenly not be able to get 50%+1.
So why did he finally come out, veto and speak against it now when it has been a story and an issue for months and on his desk for days? Wouldn't his words and threats of actions been more powerful a month or so ago?
Simple questions. Simple answer.
The reason he did it was to shift the story.
The story going into this weekend was probably going to be one of two things. Either the majority of Democrats vote to override the constitution and the will of the people on being able to vote for their supreme court judges.
Or The Democrats budget that is cutting a lot of social services and government jobs. Neither story helps Dems.
The Governor throws out a meaningless veto on a somewhat controversial bill mere minutes after the judicial selection bill passes and that night, the weekends stories and editorials all shift to the gun bill. It sucks all the air out of the room.
I also think it is part of an overall Democrat plan to keep the entire year looking like the only thing going on is guns. I think many of them honestly think that all the talk on guns is hurting us so they want to keep the talk on that one issue as long and as often as they can. That somehow they can make it look like that is all the "supposed" new Republican majority wants to talk about. Oddly, about half the gun bills or more this year were run by Democrats.
Think about it. The Dems have locked down on every other big issue. Education reform? Dead. Illegal immigration reform? Dead. Voting reform? Dead. Health care reform? Dead. Real tort or judicial reform? Dead.
One story and one story only. Guns and how Republicans want to give them out to drunken felons at local honky tonks and little children in parks. For the most part I think the legal gun owners have done an excellent job in the media dispelling half truths and out right lies. I guess they will have to keep it up for another week or two anyway.
So why did he finally come out, veto and speak against it now when it has been a story and an issue for months and on his desk for days? Wouldn't his words and threats of actions been more powerful a month or so ago?
Simple questions. Simple answer.
The reason he did it was to shift the story.
The story going into this weekend was probably going to be one of two things. Either the majority of Democrats vote to override the constitution and the will of the people on being able to vote for their supreme court judges.
Or The Democrats budget that is cutting a lot of social services and government jobs. Neither story helps Dems.
The Governor throws out a meaningless veto on a somewhat controversial bill mere minutes after the judicial selection bill passes and that night, the weekends stories and editorials all shift to the gun bill. It sucks all the air out of the room.
I also think it is part of an overall Democrat plan to keep the entire year looking like the only thing going on is guns. I think many of them honestly think that all the talk on guns is hurting us so they want to keep the talk on that one issue as long and as often as they can. That somehow they can make it look like that is all the "supposed" new Republican majority wants to talk about. Oddly, about half the gun bills or more this year were run by Democrats.
Think about it. The Dems have locked down on every other big issue. Education reform? Dead. Illegal immigration reform? Dead. Voting reform? Dead. Health care reform? Dead. Real tort or judicial reform? Dead.
One story and one story only. Guns and how Republicans want to give them out to drunken felons at local honky tonks and little children in parks. For the most part I think the legal gun owners have done an excellent job in the media dispelling half truths and out right lies. I guess they will have to keep it up for another week or two anyway.
5 cross overs
5 Dems crossed over and voted against judicial selection. Oddly Rep. Henry Fincher spoke strongly for the bill but when the vote was taken he voted against it.
A political vote?
I guess it would be similar to the vote he made two years ago against my bill allowing state control of guns made and sold in the state of Tennessee. The exact same bill he ran and passed himself today.
Possibly he just thought about it.
A political vote?
I guess it would be similar to the vote he made two years ago against my bill allowing state control of guns made and sold in the state of Tennessee. The exact same bill he ran and passed himself today.
Possibly he just thought about it.
Ratted out
Someone told the Dems our plan. Naifeh killed his amendment. The interesting part was all the Dems voted against the old judicial selection process.
A vote for judicial selection is a vote against judicial selection
An odd opportunity has popped up and could throw the entire judicial selection bill into chaos. Jimmy Naifeh is going to offer an amendment to go back to the judicial selection process. The senate has said if any non approved amendment goes on to the judicial selection bill that they will kill the bill and not bring any other judicial selection bills forward.
When that happens we go back to contested elections as was intended by the constitution.
So to vote against judicial selection we vote for judicial selection.
Actually many of the members will vote blue light. It is not a vote in favor of the amendment but if the Dems go with Naifeh all it will take is a majority of the members voting and blue will not count. A hand full of votes could carry the day.
When that happens we go back to contested elections as was intended by the constitution.
So to vote against judicial selection we vote for judicial selection.
Actually many of the members will vote blue light. It is not a vote in favor of the amendment but if the Dems go with Naifeh all it will take is a majority of the members voting and blue will not count. A hand full of votes could carry the day.
Judicial selection
Is up today. I expect 17 to hold fast to the constitution and fight for true contested elections as the constitution requires and their oath binds them to. 7 more are on the wire and can go either way.
It's all about the votes
The Dems have decided to not protest the change in the election commission. Why were they in lock down before and just rolling over now?
When it was presented a few weeks back a few Republicans were out sick and we didn't have the votes to pass it (you need 50 votes to make it happen). When the Dems went into lock down, Mumps played it smart and rolled the bill till later when we would have 50 votes for sure. The senate also made clear they were ready to shut it all down if the Dems did not go along. Now we are back up to full strength and the Dems can not stop it.
When it was presented a few weeks back a few Republicans were out sick and we didn't have the votes to pass it (you need 50 votes to make it happen). When the Dems went into lock down, Mumps played it smart and rolled the bill till later when we would have 50 votes for sure. The senate also made clear they were ready to shut it all down if the Dems did not go along. Now we are back up to full strength and the Dems can not stop it.
Tuesday, May 26, 2009
Did he just say that?
Rep. Coley is a person who is known to bring up Chinese references on many occasions. Occasionally he is teased about it. Today when calling on Rep. Coley Speaker Williams called him Rep. Cooley.
A bit over the line.
A bit over the line.
Opt out
Guns in parks with Opt out ability for the locals passes. 54 for -41 against - 4 not voting.
"We made you. We can take you out!
The sovereignty resolution passes telling the federal government it is getting too intrusive in state issues.
Rep. Mike Turner tried to make the argument the state gets involved in local laws and why are we getting involved in federal politics.
The fact that the states made the local municipalities as well as federal government sort of shut that argument down.
Rep. Mike Turner tried to make the argument the state gets involved in local laws and why are we getting involved in federal politics.
The fact that the states made the local municipalities as well as federal government sort of shut that argument down.
Monday, May 25, 2009
Anyone remember......
Does anyone remember the $61 million dollars of your money the state spent last year that was going to build a switchgrass refinery? It was supposedly going to produce 250,000 gallons of cheap fuel in 2009 alone! Tennessee could have the lowest gas prices in the nation in no time!
Yes, Tennessee was going to be a real leader in this new green technology! It was going to be the greatest thing since sliced bread. Good for the environment, cheap fuel and virtually no off cast waste. Tennessee is going to be way out front! All the research was virtually done. A mass production facility was just needed to show it could work on a large scale. Quit holding back the money you ignorant hayseed!
It is funny how people run into each other. I was at a cookout my uncle had at a state park yesterday. One of the other guests worked for the higher ups at UT's Agriculture department. Curious, I asked how the switchgrass refinery was coming. They shot back a "Don't you know?" look and said it was not going to be much of a refinery after all. It has been scaled back to more of a research facility for switchgrass and not much actual production of fuel would ever come to pass. More testing is needed. Lots of research still to go.
How bout the bio fuel craze and all the tax incentives and tax credits given out for those refineries in Memphis? How much are they producing? Welcome to mothball city.
Your tax dollars at work.
This year we are spending your money on solar technology.
Yes, Tennessee is going to be a real leader in this new green technology! It is going to be the greatest thing since sliced bread. Good for the environment, cheap fuel and virtually no off cast waste. Tennessee is going to be way out front! Since no large breakthroughs have happened in solar for many years, it is ready for a huge breakthrough now. All the research is practically done. A massive research facility is just needed to show it can work on a large scale.........
Yes, Tennessee was going to be a real leader in this new green technology! It was going to be the greatest thing since sliced bread. Good for the environment, cheap fuel and virtually no off cast waste. Tennessee is going to be way out front! All the research was virtually done. A mass production facility was just needed to show it could work on a large scale. Quit holding back the money you ignorant hayseed!
It is funny how people run into each other. I was at a cookout my uncle had at a state park yesterday. One of the other guests worked for the higher ups at UT's Agriculture department. Curious, I asked how the switchgrass refinery was coming. They shot back a "Don't you know?" look and said it was not going to be much of a refinery after all. It has been scaled back to more of a research facility for switchgrass and not much actual production of fuel would ever come to pass. More testing is needed. Lots of research still to go.
How bout the bio fuel craze and all the tax incentives and tax credits given out for those refineries in Memphis? How much are they producing? Welcome to mothball city.
Your tax dollars at work.
This year we are spending your money on solar technology.
Yes, Tennessee is going to be a real leader in this new green technology! It is going to be the greatest thing since sliced bread. Good for the environment, cheap fuel and virtually no off cast waste. Tennessee is going to be way out front! Since no large breakthroughs have happened in solar for many years, it is ready for a huge breakthrough now. All the research is practically done. A massive research facility is just needed to show it can work on a large scale.........
Sunday, May 24, 2009
The first step for socialized medicine
IT passed the first committee on a party line vote. Kay Brooks has more. This bill makes the finger print issue look like child's play. It could get ugly.
Friday, May 22, 2009
I guess those illegal millions don't count
Governor Phil says one of the most hypocritical things I have heard since oh.....Wednesday, when speaking on removing fundraising limits.
"Gov. Phil Bredesen said he hasn't seen the legislation, but believes "there's a reason for limits."
"I've always taken the attitude I'm going to work within whatever rules the Legislature passes on these things," Bredesen said. "I certainly have not proposed ever changing those limits."
Really?
When did that thinking start? Possibly after you dumped millions illegally into your own first gubernatorial campaign against the current state law limits?
Must have been.
"Gov. Phil Bredesen said he hasn't seen the legislation, but believes "there's a reason for limits."
"I've always taken the attitude I'm going to work within whatever rules the Legislature passes on these things," Bredesen said. "I certainly have not proposed ever changing those limits."
Really?
When did that thinking start? Possibly after you dumped millions illegally into your own first gubernatorial campaign against the current state law limits?
Must have been.
Thursday, May 21, 2009
We are now the emotion police
HB 484 now says if I get an electronic message that puts me at "Emotional distress" I can sue and it is a criminal act where I can have you put in jail for up to a year. Watch your comments. It just passed and I get distressed easily.
Guns opt out, in. Opt in, out. Up
Frank Nicleys bill to allow guns in state parks has been amended to allow guns in local parks. The bill allows the local community to opt OUT. A similar bill by Harry Tindell would allow for local parks to be no carry, with the option for the locals to allow it (Opt in). Tindells bill is not moving in the senate. Nicelys bill is scheduled to be up later today.
Pull my finger
Senator Joe Haynes (D) talks about why he is in support of police being able to mandate fingerprinting while many others say it should not be mandated and could be abused. The bill was pulled from its slot on yesterdays calender and put off for one week in the hopes of passage next Thursday.
Wednesday, May 20, 2009
Genetic link to autism found
It is not the end of autism but it is a good beginning. The gene is thought to limit the absorption of calcium.
I hate to say I told you so....
But here it is. Right from the donkeys mouth. The Dems are in lock down. AC does a good job as well as Jeff woods getting the quotes and interviews.
Dems go into lock down
The dirty part of legislating is starting. The Democrats have gone into lock down mode on their members and mandated they kill charter schools. The committee adjourned for the year without getting to vote on the bill. So much for "Bipartisanship".
I was wondering why all the Democrats were late to floor session today. They must have been putting the screws to the troops on their key issues. The Dems have gone into attack mode on many issues lately and are going around saying "They started it". Really? Where? When?
I was wondering why all the Democrats were late to floor session today. They must have been putting the screws to the troops on their key issues. The Dems have gone into attack mode on many issues lately and are going around saying "They started it". Really? Where? When?
Dems not ready to work
As expected the Dems are now admitting they are not ready to start work on the budget and wont be for WEEKS!
Worse yet, When they do bring someting forward they are wanting tax increases.
Worse yet, When they do bring someting forward they are wanting tax increases.
Gettin the finger!
The senate rolled the finger print bill. The votes are not lining up!
Good job people. You made your voice loud and clear. It is looking like legislators are listening. More on this later.........
Good job people. You made your voice loud and clear. It is looking like legislators are listening. More on this later.........
The sweep
In the third and final game with the interns (Flag football) it was looking like it might be a tough battle. After the rally put on by the legislators in softball, the bigger (younger) interns were ready for revenge. The legislators were quite shorthanded. In fact it was looking like the legislators may not even be able to field a 7 person team. Executive privilege was used and a special player was recruited to quarterback and give us 7 players. That player was Bill Dunns daughter (Katie Dunn) Who was stopping by to visit her father after college graduation. Another girl on the legislators team? What could be the harm thought the interns.
With an equal number of players on the field and Bills daughter at the helm it was almost unfair. The legislators marched down the field and quickly scored touchdown after touchdown. Katie scored the first TD And evaded blitz after blitz leaving her male defender on the ground bloodied and winded. Did we mention she was the MVP champion for Notre Dames flag football league? No? I can't remember.
In the meantime our defence put the Pittsburgh Steelers "Iron curtain" to shame. Interceptions by legislators almost outnumbered completions for the interns.
By halftime the legislators and staff were jingling the keys.
Final score, Legislators 23, Interns 0.
If you add up all the scores of all the games played the legislators swept the interns by an average of double digits.
Now what about this resolution?
With an equal number of players on the field and Bills daughter at the helm it was almost unfair. The legislators marched down the field and quickly scored touchdown after touchdown. Katie scored the first TD And evaded blitz after blitz leaving her male defender on the ground bloodied and winded. Did we mention she was the MVP champion for Notre Dames flag football league? No? I can't remember.
In the meantime our defence put the Pittsburgh Steelers "Iron curtain" to shame. Interceptions by legislators almost outnumbered completions for the interns.
By halftime the legislators and staff were jingling the keys.
Final score, Legislators 23, Interns 0.
If you add up all the scores of all the games played the legislators swept the interns by an average of double digits.
Now what about this resolution?
Tuesday, May 19, 2009
Joke of the week (Great comeback line)
For those that don't know him, Major General Peter Cosgrove is an 'Australian treasure!
General Cosgrove was interviewed on the radio recently.
You'll love his reply to the lady who interviewed him concerning guns and children.. Regardless of how you feel about gun laws you gotta love this! This is one of the best comeback lines of all time.. It is a portion of an ABC interview between a female broadcaster and General Cosgrove who was about to sponsor a Boy Scout Troop visiting his military headquarters.
FEMALE INTERVIEWER:
So, General Cosgrove, what things are you going to teach these young boys when they visit your base?
GENERAL COSGROVE:
We're going to teach them climbing, canoeing, archery and shooting.
FEMALE INTERVIEWER:
Shooting! That's a bit irresponsible, isn't it?
GENERAL COSGROVE:
I don't see why, they'll be properly supervised on the rifle range.
FEMALE INTERVIEWER:
Don't you admit that this is a terribly dangerous activity to be teaching children?
GENERAL COSGROVE:
I don't see how. We will be teaching them proper rifle discipline before they even touch a firearm.
FEMALE INTERVIEWER:
But you're equipping them to become violent killers.
GENERAL COSGROVE:
Well, Ma'am, you're equipped to be a prostitute, but you're not one, are you?
The radio went silent and the interview ended.
General Cosgrove was interviewed on the radio recently.
You'll love his reply to the lady who interviewed him concerning guns and children.. Regardless of how you feel about gun laws you gotta love this! This is one of the best comeback lines of all time.. It is a portion of an ABC interview between a female broadcaster and General Cosgrove who was about to sponsor a Boy Scout Troop visiting his military headquarters.
FEMALE INTERVIEWER:
So, General Cosgrove, what things are you going to teach these young boys when they visit your base?
GENERAL COSGROVE:
We're going to teach them climbing, canoeing, archery and shooting.
FEMALE INTERVIEWER:
Shooting! That's a bit irresponsible, isn't it?
GENERAL COSGROVE:
I don't see why, they'll be properly supervised on the rifle range.
FEMALE INTERVIEWER:
Don't you admit that this is a terribly dangerous activity to be teaching children?
GENERAL COSGROVE:
I don't see how. We will be teaching them proper rifle discipline before they even touch a firearm.
FEMALE INTERVIEWER:
But you're equipping them to become violent killers.
GENERAL COSGROVE:
Well, Ma'am, you're equipped to be a prostitute, but you're not one, are you?
The radio went silent and the interview ended.
The minority of the minority
After last nights passage of SJR127 I think it is getting more and more clear that the far left that used to run the show around the capitol is loosing control. For years a few people have been able to bottle up conservative legislation in the committee process. They had the numbers and the votes. When the liberal Democrat leadership snapped its fingers the troops (conservative and liberal) fell in line and voted in lockstep.
With the latest round of losses in elections and with conservative legislation (Guns, SJR127) passing by big numbers I have to wonder how long the liberal wing of the Democrat party will be able to hold on to the reigns of leadership in their party.
Yes, last night their were some shockers. Some Dems I thought would never vote for SJR127 did. I was pleasantly surprised, but I have been surprised a lot this year. Some people I thought would never support gun owner rights were actually the ones carrying legislation for gun owners. More then a few times this year I have heard "Where did that come from?", "What is he doing carrying that bill?", "He voted for what?" in the capitol halls. Many Republicans are shocked the way things are going this year. Not in mass in committee yet, but more and more Dems are stepping away from their party leadership and voting for conservative legislation on the floor. It is not all the time. We are still having a difficult time with illegal immigration, election and education reform but some things are starting to happen in other areas.
Were they "political conversions"? Possibly. Possibly some did not truly "See the light" but they are now "Feeling the heat". I guess, in politics, when it comes time to add the votes up the heat can be just as good as the light. If the next round of elections continue to go in Republican direction I expect a power shift will occur in the Tennessee Democrat party leadership. The old time conservative Democrats could take control of their party back over from its more liberal wing of current leadership.
With the latest round of losses in elections and with conservative legislation (Guns, SJR127) passing by big numbers I have to wonder how long the liberal wing of the Democrat party will be able to hold on to the reigns of leadership in their party.
Yes, last night their were some shockers. Some Dems I thought would never vote for SJR127 did. I was pleasantly surprised, but I have been surprised a lot this year. Some people I thought would never support gun owner rights were actually the ones carrying legislation for gun owners. More then a few times this year I have heard "Where did that come from?", "What is he doing carrying that bill?", "He voted for what?" in the capitol halls. Many Republicans are shocked the way things are going this year. Not in mass in committee yet, but more and more Dems are stepping away from their party leadership and voting for conservative legislation on the floor. It is not all the time. We are still having a difficult time with illegal immigration, election and education reform but some things are starting to happen in other areas.
Were they "political conversions"? Possibly. Possibly some did not truly "See the light" but they are now "Feeling the heat". I guess, in politics, when it comes time to add the votes up the heat can be just as good as the light. If the next round of elections continue to go in Republican direction I expect a power shift will occur in the Tennessee Democrat party leadership. The old time conservative Democrats could take control of their party back over from its more liberal wing of current leadership.
Monday, May 18, 2009
And on second thought.....
You may have heard the vote on SJR127 was 76-22.
Wrong.
The new adjusted vote total was 77-21.
Rep. Jim Hackworth (D-Oak ridge) later went back and changed his vote from against passage, to for the resolution.
Being from East Tennessee Jim was thought by many to be the one Democrat who could pay the political price for his original "No" vote.
Wrong.
The new adjusted vote total was 77-21.
Rep. Jim Hackworth (D-Oak ridge) later went back and changed his vote from against passage, to for the resolution.
Being from East Tennessee Jim was thought by many to be the one Democrat who could pay the political price for his original "No" vote.
Obama's socialized med in Tennessee (Part 1)
The push for Obama socialized medicine is on in Tennessee. Part one is to mandate every one be put on a similar database. All hospital records, patients records, payment plans and so forth. Get it standardized and then takeover. Here is step one for Tennessee. Coming up in Government operations committee on Wednesday.
Supplemental budget
The governor has once again put off for at least another week presenting the supplemental budget for the next year. Most insiders say his original projections were wildly optimistic and he was not giving firm plans on what he wanted to do with those numbers.
Now times are even worse and we still don't have a budget to look at just a lot of whisper and rumors.
We keep getting deeper and deeper into the session and most people are starting to realize the governor is just playing a waiting game. He is hoping by the late date that he finally presents it we will just all fold up and go home and not argue about what he gives us. What we do hear is he is already planning cuts of 10 to 12 percent from most departments (with layoffs and furloughs for many state employees) cuts to the mentally ill, handicapped and Tenncare. Close to original pre stimulus numbers. I think he is hoping some sacred cows of his may not feel the knife if he can ram it through late enough(Can anyone say $25 million from pre K?)
Projections for next year are estimated at 2/10ths of 1 percent up. With the mish mash of projections past I would not hold your breath.
Now times are even worse and we still don't have a budget to look at just a lot of whisper and rumors.
We keep getting deeper and deeper into the session and most people are starting to realize the governor is just playing a waiting game. He is hoping by the late date that he finally presents it we will just all fold up and go home and not argue about what he gives us. What we do hear is he is already planning cuts of 10 to 12 percent from most departments (with layoffs and furloughs for many state employees) cuts to the mentally ill, handicapped and Tenncare. Close to original pre stimulus numbers. I think he is hoping some sacred cows of his may not feel the knife if he can ram it through late enough(Can anyone say $25 million from pre K?)
Projections for next year are estimated at 2/10ths of 1 percent up. With the mish mash of projections past I would not hold your breath.
Beat to the punch
I was planning on running a bill next year that would allow confiscated guns to be sold and the proceeds go to the county or the police force that confiscated it.
I was beaten to the punch by David Shepard and HB2376. This is a good bill that could keep some rare and valuable guns in circulation instead of having them be destroyed. It would include guns purchased in buyback programs.
I was beaten to the punch by David Shepard and HB2376. This is a good bill that could keep some rare and valuable guns in circulation instead of having them be destroyed. It would include guns purchased in buyback programs.
Illegal identification
After much debate the bill telling local police to inform homeland security when an illegal alien is arrested passed. Not one to point it out but the "Sherriff's Association" sent out a memo in opposition to the legislation. No names or counties were mentioned. It was also pointed out the association misspelled "Sheriff". The memo appeared at the 11th hour when the bill was being presented on the floor even though the bill had been around for months. Final vote 67 for, 24 against, 4 present not voting. All the No's and passes were Democrats.
Saturday, May 16, 2009
Fingerprints are us
The government is setting up a system to get everyones fingerprints. Sort of reminds me of gun registrations. Why have them if they are not going into a future database? More from the Tennessean
Tuesday, May 12, 2009
Where are the animal rights activists?
My uncle the former paratrooper used to do this to try and gross us out as kids.
Not that I wouldn't if I had to, but is this the goal lifestyle of the modern liberal? I mean, come on. You are going to have to try and do better then that if you can ever hope to convert people.
If this is the future of the "Green lifestyle" I will happily continue to live in the red.
Not that I wouldn't if I had to, but is this the goal lifestyle of the modern liberal? I mean, come on. You are going to have to try and do better then that if you can ever hope to convert people.
If this is the future of the "Green lifestyle" I will happily continue to live in the red.
A rose by any other name
There is a blow up coming on the native American issue. Not between the white cowboys and the native Americans but between the multiple factions of the native Americans themselves.
This turf battle all comes down to two issues dealing with recognition. Many descendants of the local Indian tribes want recognition to say they are Indian. Not so they can have casinos (That is already clearly out of the question) but so they can sell "native American" or "Indian" crafts. Yes, those names are copyrighted and can only be used by recognized native American tribal descendants. The second reason is so they can be eligible for federal funds/grants/tax breaks or incentives (for medical centers and things like that).
Currently the federal government only recognizes direct descendants of native Americans that made the move during relocation. If they stayed or hid out they and their descendants lost their recognition no matter if they were 100% native American or not. The recognized tribes that moved don't want to recognize those that did not move because they would loose their monopoly on their selling of goods and exclusive take on the federal grants.
The Tennessee native Americans only hope is for state recognition. Previously the state recognition board was made up almost exclusively of the out of state native American tribe members who were nationally recognized already.
Guess how the efforts to get state recognition went?
Now the move is on to get some tribe members recognition by directly bypassing the state board that has not recognized any tribes in as far back as anyone can remember.
To me this seems like an easy one. Although I am not a big fan of grants based on national origin or race, if I legally came to America and say I was formerly 100% full blooded Italian I would think it would be OK to sell "Italian" food. If I were Mexican I would expect to be able to sell "Mexican" blankets or whatever. If I were....Well you get the picture. (Please feel free to save yourself the time on your "You aren't very PC" comments. I know that is not all they sell or can do)
The Tennessee Indian tribes have been working on this issue for years. This could be the year they finally see some daylight.
This turf battle all comes down to two issues dealing with recognition. Many descendants of the local Indian tribes want recognition to say they are Indian. Not so they can have casinos (That is already clearly out of the question) but so they can sell "native American" or "Indian" crafts. Yes, those names are copyrighted and can only be used by recognized native American tribal descendants. The second reason is so they can be eligible for federal funds/grants/tax breaks or incentives (for medical centers and things like that).
Currently the federal government only recognizes direct descendants of native Americans that made the move during relocation. If they stayed or hid out they and their descendants lost their recognition no matter if they were 100% native American or not. The recognized tribes that moved don't want to recognize those that did not move because they would loose their monopoly on their selling of goods and exclusive take on the federal grants.
The Tennessee native Americans only hope is for state recognition. Previously the state recognition board was made up almost exclusively of the out of state native American tribe members who were nationally recognized already.
Guess how the efforts to get state recognition went?
Now the move is on to get some tribe members recognition by directly bypassing the state board that has not recognized any tribes in as far back as anyone can remember.
To me this seems like an easy one. Although I am not a big fan of grants based on national origin or race, if I legally came to America and say I was formerly 100% full blooded Italian I would think it would be OK to sell "Italian" food. If I were Mexican I would expect to be able to sell "Mexican" blankets or whatever. If I were....Well you get the picture. (Please feel free to save yourself the time on your "You aren't very PC" comments. I know that is not all they sell or can do)
The Tennessee Indian tribes have been working on this issue for years. This could be the year they finally see some daylight.
Guns at the capitol
The Lt. governor and the speaker are split. Guess who is for gun owners and who is against?
Monday, May 11, 2009
Stopping revenue cameras
A new move is on to stop or adjust revenue cameras (Also known as red light and speed cameras). The cameras have come in and out of favor the last few years. Many local communities have put them in to see a revenue jump and later taken them out as public outcry has increased.
The argument most used for implementation is they are purely for safety. Not revenue. The facts of the claim go back and forth. Most agree side impacts go down slightly but rear impacts and whiplash go up dramatically for red light cameras. No known impact of speed cameras is known by me but with both, the revenue question is not a question. They make money, and lots of it.
The pubic outcry has been strong against the cameras. The state is now ready to get into the mix. How to stop them has become an issue. Baning a revenue generator was met with harsh criticism a few years ago. But the thought of taking the money from the locals? Suddenly I think we may need a little more time to discuss this important safety topic.
The latest ideas have come from other states. Some are mandating that the money raised go into drivers ed courses in schools. Others want the state to just take the money outright and put it in their general fund or use it for education.
With revenue shortfalls, Tennessee is looking at plans to do some revenue shifting. Will the money go for education or to general fund is the big question. I am sure the state will be fine with allowing the locals to keep the increased "safety".
As you can imagine the locals are not for those plans so much. With the additional revenue generated gone the motivation for additional "safety" diminishes. Most of the local communities take the cameras out in short order or forgo the implementation of new ones.
Not worth the pain in the neck.
More on fingerprinting
Another article on the fingerprinting of everyone who gets a ticket. It is up for a final vote in the senate today. I wonder how many people will go to jail for not providing their fingerprints if this passes.
Sunday, May 10, 2009
AG: Election mean election, except for elections.
The AG has made it clear. A retention vote is not an election (potentially for legislators and the gov.). Yet when the exact same word "Election" is used in another part of the constitution (for judges) it could mean anything.
Glad that is all cleared up.
Glad that is all cleared up.
Thursday, May 07, 2009
The best time spent
The best way you could possibly spend the next 20 minutes of your life would be to watch this video. It is a true slice of Tennessee history in rare form.
Guns in restaurants that serve alcohol
Passes 66 to 23. All time and age restrictions were stripped off. Legal gun owners will now be able carry in more places then you can smoke. Of course smoking kills more people then legal gun owners do.
Congrats to Curry Todd for passing something that has been 15 years plus in the making.
Congrats to Curry Todd for passing something that has been 15 years plus in the making.
I wonder about ....
HB 2220 by Stewart. The bill will allow locals law enforcement agencies to mandate a finger print be given on all tickets. No matter guilt or innocent.
How long till the database is started up?
How long till the database is started up?
Bell's bill passes
61 to 27. We had 2 hours of debate. We probably won't argue that long on the budget.
State recognition of home school diplomas
Mike Bells bill to correct the misconception that a home school is not a valid diploma to be recognized by the state for jobs is being battled on the house floor. It is looking like the Dems are trying to filibuster the bill. We are working to limit debate and get an up or down vote on the bill.
Wednesday, May 06, 2009
John J lights them up
From what I heard John J Hooker lit them up in the senate speaking In committee regarding judicial selection. One senator I spoke to was too impressed to describe it. He was saying it was too good for words and this senator is not easy to impress. John J made the worms squirm. His argument was supposedly tight, to the point and interesting.
I have been Lucky enough to see John J in action and speak to him several times. He is a real treat. A classic old school Democrat that has been been minimized by the new more liberal Democrat party. Don't be mislead. He is sharp as a tack and more well read then any two lawyers on the hill regarding Tennessee constitutional law. Tennessee would be a better place with more Democrats like him on the floor.
I plan on putting up the video as soon as I can find out how to edit to him speaking. I hear it is must see.
I have been Lucky enough to see John J in action and speak to him several times. He is a real treat. A classic old school Democrat that has been been minimized by the new more liberal Democrat party. Don't be mislead. He is sharp as a tack and more well read then any two lawyers on the hill regarding Tennessee constitutional law. Tennessee would be a better place with more Democrats like him on the floor.
I plan on putting up the video as soon as I can find out how to edit to him speaking. I hear it is must see.
2000 posts
I just passed 2000 posts on my blog. I imagine that equates to about 22,318 misspeled words, 2941 tpyos, 4,494 run on sentences but I am sure you know how it is I mean everyone does that once in a while right, right, well there you go, 3,593 improper use or fazing of a words, 284934 missed punctuations and I am sure many other things.
Luckily my goal was never to show off my fancy typing or righting skills. Of course all the former and wannabe English teachers out there are now ready to, or already have, burned their computers from reading this blog.
Thank you all for your patients. I have tried to get better on my English but I know many of you still cringe. Possibly I should try one of those English as a second language classes. It might help. Or not.
And just FYI. I plan on continuing to post as I see fit. All you lefties try and not chip a tooth as you put the barrel in your mouth.
Luckily my goal was never to show off my fancy typing or righting skills. Of course all the former and wannabe English teachers out there are now ready to, or already have, burned their computers from reading this blog.
Thank you all for your patients. I have tried to get better on my English but I know many of you still cringe. Possibly I should try one of those English as a second language classes. It might help. Or not.
And just FYI. I plan on continuing to post as I see fit. All you lefties try and not chip a tooth as you put the barrel in your mouth.
Cut and run
One of the two top stories for today happened in the full house judiciary committee over HB 1762. The bill would give parents the rights to their minor children's medical records.
The lefties went crazy. They know this could be a step toward informed consent of a minor who wants an abortion. This issue was brought home with the recent very questionable (probably illegal) actions done by planned parenthood Memphis that were caught on tape. A Planned Parenthood worker told a presumed a 14 year old to lie to a judge about her age and the age of her 31 year old boyfriend to get him to allow her to have an abortion with out parental consent and to cover up the statutory rape.
Just as the bill was getting interesting and the Dems started to realize they could lose the vote they moved to adjourn the meeting in the middle of the bill being presented. The Republicans were objecting and calling for a vote on the motion to adjourn but chairman Coleman said more or less "I'm gone" and scurried out of the room with his fellow Democrats. Expect one Democrat to change their voting pattern or be out of the room when it comes up again next week.
You can view the judiciary committee here. It is the last bill presented.
The lefties went crazy. They know this could be a step toward informed consent of a minor who wants an abortion. This issue was brought home with the recent very questionable (probably illegal) actions done by planned parenthood Memphis that were caught on tape. A Planned Parenthood worker told a presumed a 14 year old to lie to a judge about her age and the age of her 31 year old boyfriend to get him to allow her to have an abortion with out parental consent and to cover up the statutory rape.
Just as the bill was getting interesting and the Dems started to realize they could lose the vote they moved to adjourn the meeting in the middle of the bill being presented. The Republicans were objecting and calling for a vote on the motion to adjourn but chairman Coleman said more or less "I'm gone" and scurried out of the room with his fellow Democrats. Expect one Democrat to change their voting pattern or be out of the room when it comes up again next week.
You can view the judiciary committee here. It is the last bill presented.
Stuck in committee
I hate when this happens. Some times legislators have to be in two places at one time. In a committee they serve on and in another committee to present a bill. Today was one of those days. My bill to get rid of some of the states airplanes came up at the same time we were voting on bills in children and family committee (a committee I sit on). Early in session the chairman will roll the bill one week if the sponsor is not available to present their bill but here at the end of session committees are closing down so any bills not presented are rolled until 2010. Such was the case for my airplane bill.
Oh well, by next year I will hopefully have even more info to present my bill.
Oh well, by next year I will hopefully have even more info to present my bill.
Tuesday, May 05, 2009
Fly me to the moon
As many of you may have read I have a bill up in the morning to sell all but two of the states owned aircraft (This does not include the 25 plus airplanes owned and used by higher ed). When I first read the state had over 50 airplanes I asked when was the planned blitzkrieg on Georgia? The number and cost blew me away.
The more I dig on this issue the uglier it gets. Hull value (Resale value) of found state owned aircraft is already over 9 million dollars. Insurance cost every year is $50,000.00. I am still digging on the fuel costs, pilot costs, maintenance costs, inspection costs, licence cost, hangar costs, etc. these are all ongoing costs we have to pay every year weather we use the plains or not.
The expected cost to fly regular airlines and or charter/ rent a private aircraft as needed for similar services is around 100 grand a year. When all the expenses are added up for the Tennessee air force I bet the ongoing cost shift is a net positive to the state by going to airlines, charter and rental.
That does not include the $9,000,000.00 we would put in our pocket from the sale of the surplus aircraft. Even if none of the ongoing expenses were added in, It would take 90 years to offset the gain made by selling the airplanes. 90 years! Well past the expected lifespan of any aircraft we may currently own.
I showed the list of airplanes to another legislator who is also a former pilot. The first thing he did was let out a low whistle. One of the planes was valued at $1,800,000.00 He knew the aircraft and thought there was no reason to have such a high end aircraft. He also asked about the governors two airplanes. I said what airplanes and he said the governor supposedly has two private jets at his disposal not on the list and not low end planes either. I plan on doing some more digging if given the time.
This could be a nice gem in a tight budget year.
The more I dig on this issue the uglier it gets. Hull value (Resale value) of found state owned aircraft is already over 9 million dollars. Insurance cost every year is $50,000.00. I am still digging on the fuel costs, pilot costs, maintenance costs, inspection costs, licence cost, hangar costs, etc. these are all ongoing costs we have to pay every year weather we use the plains or not.
The expected cost to fly regular airlines and or charter/ rent a private aircraft as needed for similar services is around 100 grand a year. When all the expenses are added up for the Tennessee air force I bet the ongoing cost shift is a net positive to the state by going to airlines, charter and rental.
That does not include the $9,000,000.00 we would put in our pocket from the sale of the surplus aircraft. Even if none of the ongoing expenses were added in, It would take 90 years to offset the gain made by selling the airplanes. 90 years! Well past the expected lifespan of any aircraft we may currently own.
I showed the list of airplanes to another legislator who is also a former pilot. The first thing he did was let out a low whistle. One of the planes was valued at $1,800,000.00 He knew the aircraft and thought there was no reason to have such a high end aircraft. He also asked about the governors two airplanes. I said what airplanes and he said the governor supposedly has two private jets at his disposal not on the list and not low end planes either. I plan on doing some more digging if given the time.
This could be a nice gem in a tight budget year.
Who is responsible for your children?
Simple question. Simple answer.
A bunch of us just shook our heads when she said it in children and family committee. Unfortunately, this theory is not held by just one single legislator. There are several who push this agenda and have this mind set.
A bunch of us just shook our heads when she said it in children and family committee. Unfortunately, this theory is not held by just one single legislator. There are several who push this agenda and have this mind set.
Carnac on Cammack
The great swami Carnac the magnificent holds the hermetically sealed envelope to his jewel encrusted turban. Closes his eyes and gets a vision. Slowly he responds. Who is Ward Cammack?
He opens the envelope and reads the question.
"Who is for civil unions, gay adoption, against nuclear power, gave tons of money to Republicans a few years ago and is not going to win any political race in Tennessee?"
See the video here. It gets pitiful after a while.
Monday, May 04, 2009
Opt in or opt out
Tom Humphreys gets the definition battle going for a lot of our legislation this year. To op in or opt out and what is local control.
Big issue.
What it means for a big issue (guns) is...
Opt out means all local parks would be legal for licenced people to carry in and if a local community does not like it they can opt out certain parks or all parks.
Opt in means guns are banned everywhere and if some community does not like it they can opt to allow legal guns in certain parks.
Some people feel it is a right to carry first and restrictions can be put on that right but the right first belongs to the individual. Others want government to have initial control of the right and allow it as they see fit.
Rights given to the individual are harder to take away then rights that are already gone that may someday allowed by government. There has to be a very strong push to overturn the statuesque. Many times the will of the people to allow freedom is subverted by the minority as we had in the state house for years. It took 20+ years to even get the idea up for an up or down vote on the full house floor on many gun bills. Now it is happening.
The same barriers and restrictions could happen in community after community across the state.
It all comes down to one issue. Who do you trust? The people, or the government to make decisions on when they feel you should be given your constitutional rights? That issue can come down to two sets of words.
Opt in or Opt out.
Big issue.
What it means for a big issue (guns) is...
Opt out means all local parks would be legal for licenced people to carry in and if a local community does not like it they can opt out certain parks or all parks.
Opt in means guns are banned everywhere and if some community does not like it they can opt to allow legal guns in certain parks.
Some people feel it is a right to carry first and restrictions can be put on that right but the right first belongs to the individual. Others want government to have initial control of the right and allow it as they see fit.
Rights given to the individual are harder to take away then rights that are already gone that may someday allowed by government. There has to be a very strong push to overturn the statuesque. Many times the will of the people to allow freedom is subverted by the minority as we had in the state house for years. It took 20+ years to even get the idea up for an up or down vote on the full house floor on many gun bills. Now it is happening.
The same barriers and restrictions could happen in community after community across the state.
It all comes down to one issue. Who do you trust? The people, or the government to make decisions on when they feel you should be given your constitutional rights? That issue can come down to two sets of words.
Opt in or Opt out.
But that is different
Sometimes it is funny when you have the same thought as someone else but a completely different take. This is one of those times. I was on the house floor as we passed another liquor bill. This one allowing free distribution of liquor in dry counties. Later in the day we were talking about the bill that allows guns in restaurants that serve alcohol. I got to thinking of how the same people who vote against the gun bills will allow all the alcohol people can pour down their throat to the same gun owners and probably illegal gun owners. Where has gun violence been more prevalent? In restaurants that serve with legal gun owners present but not drinking or at home where people can drink all they want unrestricted?
If the mere presence of alcohol and gun owners does not mix, whether the person is drinking or not, then how is it OK when we know people are going to drink and have access to guns.
If the mere presence of alcohol and gun owners does not mix, whether the person is drinking or not, then how is it OK when we know people are going to drink and have access to guns.
Sunday, May 03, 2009
I'm leavin on a jet plane
Our good friend Reagan Farr is off on another one of his "Desperately needed" trips to Destin Florida in one of the states private planes. Why is it these important trips always seem to go to the sunny beaches of Florida? What? No airlines go from Nashville to Florida? Wow. Delta, Southwest, American Airlines and all the others must really be cutting back. Last I knew those type flights left about every hour or two and cost a couple hundred bucks. One airline was under 60 buck each way to Florida. The states private plane cost was pushing 3 grand in fuel alone not including hangar costs, pilot cost, hull cost, insurance, etc. Sound like a good investment? How bout we sell some of those planes? I have a bill to do just that. Fiscal impact is to the plus 9 million dollars in instant return and more over time. It should come up this week.
Friday, May 01, 2009
Against the decision but for the judge
I am many times confounded by people who are more then vocal in their questioning of the decisions that supreme court judges make, but are willing to close their eyes and allow them to continue on their path without any real oversight and ignore the intent of the constitution.
I can not count the number of legislators who yell and scream about the Planned Parenthood v. Sundquist decision (the decision striking down our reasonable abortion laws) saying it was activist judges reading into the constitution and creating what was clearly not there. Yet when the time comes to do something about those same activist judges they are silent, or worse, come out and say that the system that put them in place needs to stay.
They continue that any sort of political contest might influence their future decisions. How can they say their past decision are activist and clouded by their personal politics and, yet somehow, in the same breath say the judges will only continue to look at law with a totally unbiased "from on high" opinion without the thought that their personal opinion playing into their decisions? That is sort of like coming out and saying "They are partisan, unbiased and need to stay that way"
Are they biased now?
Yes. Even without those type decisions the law is quite loose in Tennessee. A lot is left up to interpretation and opinion of the judge. What is wrong with wanting ask what sort of opinion or interpretation a person might have on an issue previous to giving them a job where that opinion comes into play?
Is the system already biased?
Yes. How can you look at who is doing the appointment and what that process is and think otherwise? To think that the trial lawyers and the bar association does not have an agenda on any issue is ludicrous. They will admit they do. They take positions all the time on political issues. Their judges even take positions on political issues. They are currently active in politics.
Does anyone think these groups just walk in a room with a stat sheet and say "The most fair decision maker will have the least number of cases that are appealed or that are overturned on appeal" and then ask that person if they want the job? No. That is not how it goes at all. The decision making process is done behind closed doors and judicial philosophy is argued. The people on the board make a political decision based on who meets their ideology closest then a selection of 3 candidates is given to the governor to chose from (Or reject and get another slate of 3). Even then, does anyone really think the governor, no matter what party they are from, does not have an agenda or would not pick someone closest to their political philosophy?
Short of true popularly contested elections, as the constitution intended, the governor should be given total ability to pick the judge for filling interim vacancies. To pick from 3 pre selected bad choices is not truly giving him any choices at all. If those groups want to make suggestions that is fine but their opinion shouldn't be the end all be all. In many cases now the decision is the least of three evils.
Corruption of judges
The other argument I hear is, if judges had to run for office they would be corrupted by having to raise funds every 8 years. I wonder how many of these same elected officials will admit to being "Corrupted" by having to raise funds and run for office in the same manner every 2 years? If that is the fear make all donations to them anonymous.
Chaos theory
The argument that if we go back to contested elections it will create "Chaos" is laughable. Was it chaos for the 160 or so years that the state ran previous to when the Missouri plan was put into effect? No.
Were a judge to step down early, die or whatever there is a process in place to handle things and put a temporary judge in place should the courts become backlogged before the next election. The "Chaos" threat is empty rhetoric to scare people into settling for the status Que.
The only reason the Missouri plan (Judicial selection) was even implemented was because Winfield Dunn got elected governor and the Democrats, seeing their statewide influence slipping, went into panic mode at the thought of a Republicans getting to appoint judges on an interim basis or elect them on a full time basis. That day has come.
Politically speaking
Some Republicans fear reprisals if they don't give the trial lawyers what they want.
Why?
Trial lawyers give very little to Republicans. They almost always endorse the liberal and try to beat conservatives. Conservative lawyers are like Democrats who drive around with bumper stickers that say "I am pro gun, Pro God, pro life and a Democrat" Their are so few they have to have a bumper sticker or no one would believe they exist.
Were the majority to get what they want does anyone think it will change? No. They will just keep on keeping on. If they don't get what they want what will happen? They will be so busy spending all their money trying to keep liberals on the bench they wont have any money to get involved in political races. Win goes to conservatives in political races. In races for the bench who wins? 9 times out of 10 it is the conservative. We win both ways.
People want the ability to vote on judges. Only 16% like the current system. 19% want a federal type system. That poll result is state wide across all demographics and does not change with party affiliation. To say the people are smart enough to elect them as the person that make the laws but too dumb to elect the people who are supposed to interpret those same laws is insulting to their constituents.
Getting away from the current judicial selection process is the right thing to do. The constitution talks about an ELECTION not a SELECTION. It is good for our state, it is good for conservatism, it is good for the party and it is good for people. This is one of those times if the legislature does nothing, things get better automatically.
I can not count the number of legislators who yell and scream about the Planned Parenthood v. Sundquist decision (the decision striking down our reasonable abortion laws) saying it was activist judges reading into the constitution and creating what was clearly not there. Yet when the time comes to do something about those same activist judges they are silent, or worse, come out and say that the system that put them in place needs to stay.
They continue that any sort of political contest might influence their future decisions. How can they say their past decision are activist and clouded by their personal politics and, yet somehow, in the same breath say the judges will only continue to look at law with a totally unbiased "from on high" opinion without the thought that their personal opinion playing into their decisions? That is sort of like coming out and saying "They are partisan, unbiased and need to stay that way"
Are they biased now?
Yes. Even without those type decisions the law is quite loose in Tennessee. A lot is left up to interpretation and opinion of the judge. What is wrong with wanting ask what sort of opinion or interpretation a person might have on an issue previous to giving them a job where that opinion comes into play?
Is the system already biased?
Yes. How can you look at who is doing the appointment and what that process is and think otherwise? To think that the trial lawyers and the bar association does not have an agenda on any issue is ludicrous. They will admit they do. They take positions all the time on political issues. Their judges even take positions on political issues. They are currently active in politics.
Does anyone think these groups just walk in a room with a stat sheet and say "The most fair decision maker will have the least number of cases that are appealed or that are overturned on appeal" and then ask that person if they want the job? No. That is not how it goes at all. The decision making process is done behind closed doors and judicial philosophy is argued. The people on the board make a political decision based on who meets their ideology closest then a selection of 3 candidates is given to the governor to chose from (Or reject and get another slate of 3). Even then, does anyone really think the governor, no matter what party they are from, does not have an agenda or would not pick someone closest to their political philosophy?
Short of true popularly contested elections, as the constitution intended, the governor should be given total ability to pick the judge for filling interim vacancies. To pick from 3 pre selected bad choices is not truly giving him any choices at all. If those groups want to make suggestions that is fine but their opinion shouldn't be the end all be all. In many cases now the decision is the least of three evils.
Corruption of judges
The other argument I hear is, if judges had to run for office they would be corrupted by having to raise funds every 8 years. I wonder how many of these same elected officials will admit to being "Corrupted" by having to raise funds and run for office in the same manner every 2 years? If that is the fear make all donations to them anonymous.
Chaos theory
The argument that if we go back to contested elections it will create "Chaos" is laughable. Was it chaos for the 160 or so years that the state ran previous to when the Missouri plan was put into effect? No.
Were a judge to step down early, die or whatever there is a process in place to handle things and put a temporary judge in place should the courts become backlogged before the next election. The "Chaos" threat is empty rhetoric to scare people into settling for the status Que.
The only reason the Missouri plan (Judicial selection) was even implemented was because Winfield Dunn got elected governor and the Democrats, seeing their statewide influence slipping, went into panic mode at the thought of a Republicans getting to appoint judges on an interim basis or elect them on a full time basis. That day has come.
Politically speaking
Some Republicans fear reprisals if they don't give the trial lawyers what they want.
Why?
Trial lawyers give very little to Republicans. They almost always endorse the liberal and try to beat conservatives. Conservative lawyers are like Democrats who drive around with bumper stickers that say "I am pro gun, Pro God, pro life and a Democrat" Their are so few they have to have a bumper sticker or no one would believe they exist.
Were the majority to get what they want does anyone think it will change? No. They will just keep on keeping on. If they don't get what they want what will happen? They will be so busy spending all their money trying to keep liberals on the bench they wont have any money to get involved in political races. Win goes to conservatives in political races. In races for the bench who wins? 9 times out of 10 it is the conservative. We win both ways.
People want the ability to vote on judges. Only 16% like the current system. 19% want a federal type system. That poll result is state wide across all demographics and does not change with party affiliation. To say the people are smart enough to elect them as the person that make the laws but too dumb to elect the people who are supposed to interpret those same laws is insulting to their constituents.
Getting away from the current judicial selection process is the right thing to do. The constitution talks about an ELECTION not a SELECTION. It is good for our state, it is good for conservatism, it is good for the party and it is good for people. This is one of those times if the legislature does nothing, things get better automatically.
Thursday, April 30, 2009
MOOOOOOOVE IT OUT
The bill allowing the selling of raw unpasteurised milk has passed. Rep. Frank Nicley and Rep Glen Casada have been working on this bill for years.
Guns in restaurants
Is off to conference committee. The issue of contention is the limit on age restricted venues. The senate striped that restriction off. Some in the house want it on.
Wednesday, April 29, 2009
Plates of God, plates of shame
Do these ideas sound farmilliar? They should to this blogs loyal readers. Licence plates for religious people. This is looking like the first step For an idea brought up a year ago.
Another plate idea to put a tint or identifying information on the plate for DUI offenders has also passed committee. I thought their may be a renewed push for this last year as well. Will it have the votes to go all the way? We will see.
Another plate idea to put a tint or identifying information on the plate for DUI offenders has also passed committee. I thought their may be a renewed push for this last year as well. Will it have the votes to go all the way? We will see.
Word on the hill
Word on the hill is revenue projections will be down 1.2 to 1.3 billion dollars for the year in the next report.
This could get bigger then you think
The tax on gas is currently a fixed amount per gallon. Road builders want to make it a % of sale price. The logic is that since road building is funded by the gas tax and roads are made up of mostly oil product when oil prices go up their cost of road production does also. The down side is when gas prices hit say $4.00 be it because of oil prices or an out of control stock ma